 |
 |
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mohit Agarwal" <[log in to unmask]> To: <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 3:27 PM Subject: Re: list move > On 2000-11-30, at 14:10 -0600, Kurt W Hirchert wrote: > > KWH: It's potentially worse than that -- the author may have had his own > KWH: Reply-To: header. If the list Reply-To: replaced it, you may have hunt > KWH: through his sig or other such sources to find the "right" address to paste > KWH: into the To: field of your reply. > KWH: > KWH: P.S. I see the list inserted a Reply-To: header on your > KWH: message. Unfortunately, it's value was one that resulted in an _extremely_ > KWH: ugly To: field when I replied, so I still need to cut and paste, even in > KWH: the common case. > KWH: > KWH: -- > KWH: Kurt W Hirchert [log in to unmask] > KWH: UIUC Department of Atmospheric Sciences +1-217-265-0327 > KWH: > > I can quite gladly say that I don't find any problem now. I use pine 4.30 and > it offers me a lot of flexibility. Now when I replied to this message I was > asked: > Use "Reply-To:" address instead of "From:" address? > Saying [y]es would mean that the message would go to the list, and [n]o would > mean that it goes to the sender. > > p.s. Kurt: You seem to use Eudora. You have sigdashes that look pretty much > like the ones that you get in pine, but there's a difference. Kindly change it > to "dash dash space" instead of "dash dash". Look below, for instance, in my > signature. > > -- > Mohit Agarwal ([log in to unmask]) > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ >