I agree with your point about MLAC's emphasis on access. I think the Government needs to be made aware that there is a duty to conserve and interpret as well as to make material accessible. Some of the statements that Mr Evans has made do not augur well for the future and I wonder how much he realises that archives and museums do differ to libraries in many respects. As to the other thread and archives being 'an obscure cultural backwater, populated by eccentric recluses.' Well, I have to say that I really think this view is a legacy of the past and could be fair criticism. I don't wish to cause offence or stir anything up, but I think the profession in the past has suffered from too many people who were only too happy to sit quietly in the corner cataloguing and doing nothing to push or promote their chosen profession. Times have changed and are continuing to change, which is only to the good. But it will take time to change an image which by and large archivists themselves have created. Alan -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Milligan [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Sent: 03 March 2000 12:33 To: [log in to unmask] Cc: Richard Childs Subject: Re: New DCMS website/MLAC consultation document 3/3/00 I could not agree with Richard Childs more, especially about the link to HMC Incidentally, although, after the Thames regional meeting with Deborah Jenkins, there was a flurry of notes about how we should discuss fundamental matters, not much actual discussion has gone on. I'm on matenity leave from HMC at the moment and have subscribed to this listserve to keep in touch. I may be rather behind everyone else, but am I alone in being concerned about the emphasis placed in the MLAC consultation document on access as opposed to preservation and intellectual control? There seems to be so much stress placed on open access here and now that the interests of posterity may be being ignored? I do not know exactly what the MGC's conservation register consists of, but is it ominous that MLAC does not intend to continue it? Rosemary Hayes (this message will say it comes from Andrew Milligan - my husband - if anyone knows how to change such headings in emails, I would be greatly for suggestions off-list!) ----- Original Message ----- From: Richard Childs <[log in to unmask]> To: FRED WHICHELO <[log in to unmask]> Cc: Archive <[log in to unmask]> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2000 4:48 PM Subject: Re: New DCMS website > > > I have had a cursory look at the new DCMS website and I must admit some > considerable disappointment as may other subscribers to this listserv at the > very low, almost non-existent profile of archives on the pages. You will find > archives under "heritage,libraries and museums" on the DCMS homepage but then > only in the context of the new Museums Libraries and Archives Council. > On the links page, though the Royal Commission on Historical Manuscripts' > address is given under the libraries section, there is no hotlink to the HMC's > website. There are however hotlinks to other DCMS funded organisations such as > the Archaeological Diving Unit at St Andrews University!!. > It's all well and good having a new buddy buddy relationship between archives > and the DCMS through MLAC but it would help matters considerably if DCMS didn't > keep forgetting that we exist. > If having looked at the DCMS pages, you feel the same as I do, please e-mail > their address for feedback. If enough people do so, perhaps they may give > archives a better profile on their site. > Richard Childs, > County Archivist, > West Sussex Record Office. > > > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%