Sorry for the delay in sending out the summary of this case. Holidays and workload conspired against us!
 
Case 84:
 
Thanks to David G Williams for suggesting this case.
 
A 17year old female presented to the Casualty/Emergency Department of the Hospital with abdominal pain.
Serum results are as follows:
 
Alkaline phosphatase: 214 IU/L (upto 230)
Total protein:             110 g/L  (65- 85)
Albumin:                    45 g/L    (34 - 50)
Total bilirubin:              7µmol/L    (3 - 20)
Gamma GT:                25 IU/L (0 - 35)
AST:                           34 IU/L(0 - 25)
ALT:                            31 IU/L(0 - 25)
 
There were 35 participants in this case. There was a wide divergence of views.
 
18 participants would not comment on these results until they had electrophoresis or immunoglobulin results available.   [-0.3]
12 stated high globulin due to infection and or inflammation  [1.0]
8 would add electrophoresis to check if globulin increase was polyclonal or monoclonal before commenting. [-0.7]
10 participants would query fluid loss or dehydration. [0.3]
6 participants would contact the Doctor to discuss this case or request further drug/ clinical history [1.7]
6 participants would query autoimmune cause of increased globulins [-1.0]
5 would state note increased total protein; [-0.3]
3 participants would phone Doctor after results of electrophoresis/ immunoglobulins [0]
4 would state that myeloma was unlikely in a young person; [0.7]
3 would query increase globulins due to HIV; [-1.3]
3 would query ectopic pregnancy; [-1.7]
3 participants would not comment as medical staff should be able to determine appropiate tests from this patient's history.  [-1.3]
3 would look at the sample to check turbity/ haemolysis as this may interfer in the assay.  [1.3]
3 participant noted the slightly raised transaminases; one of these queried hepatic cell damage. [0]
3 would query SLE; [0]
2 would query monoclonal increase in globulin due to myeloma or Waldenstroms [ -0.7]
2 would suggest appendicitis should be ruled out; [0]
2 participants would query myeloma; [-0.7]
2 would query pancreatitis; [0.3]
2 suggested that high total protein could be due to interference in the assay ; [0.7]
2 queried drug use.  [-1.0]
2 would query if the tourniquet was on too long; [-1.3]
1 would check the age of the patient as myeloma is likely is patient aged 71yr instead of 17yr.  [1.0]
1 queried porphyria; [-1.7]
1 suggested possibility of intra-uterine infection. [-0.7]
1 queried lymphoid tumour; [-0.7]
1 would advise that Addison's disease should be excluded; [-0.7]
 
 
18 participants would add electrophoresis or electrophoresis + typing to this sample. [1.0]
12 participants would add amylase [1.7]
11 would add urea & electrolytes [0.7]
9 participants would quantify the immunoglobulins; [1.7]
8 would add CRP [1.0]
8 would add or request pregnancy test/ serum or urine HCG; [0]
7 would check or repeat the total protein; [0.7]
6 would add ANA [-0.3]
5 would check FBC or WCC; [1.0]
5 would add serum calcium; [1.0]
3 would each add
    glucose    [0.3]
    SLE screen    [0]
2 would each add or request
    plasma viscosity [1.0]
    urine culture    [0]
    repeat LFT in 2-3 days    [-0.3]
    autoantibody screen [1.0]
    repeat sample to confirm [0.7]  
    ESR        [1.0]
1 would each add or request
    rheumatoid factor    [0]
    drug screen    [-1.7]
    transvaginal ulrasound/ CT abdomen [-1.0]
    urine specific gravity [-1.0]
   
The assessors particularly liked the comment to check the patient's age. Nice one Graham!
David G Williams told us that their haematologist correctly suggested the cause. The high total protein was in fact due to a polyclonal gammopathy brought on by infection.
   
Best wishes
Jacqui Osypiw
Gordon Challand