 |
 |
---- [log in to unmask] wrote: > > bill flavell writes, in his usual moderate tone: > > This is so far out in left field I don't even know > how > to respond. It's patently obvious that YOU don't > have any > cinematic specificity. Why bother to be on this mailing > list then? > > and again: > > Well, this is a film philosophy mailing list, > and the > largest film-specific theory/aesthetics/philosophy > list > that I know of. And anybody who denies the specificity > of > the cinema is definitely gonna hear from me. > > this all hardly deserves comment except perhaps the suggestion > that this thread ought to be torn Well, go cry to the list moderator/moderators if you want to. It's certainy your privelege. I'm sure I've been booted off more mailing lists than you've ever subscribed to. Bill Flavell ___________________________________________________________________ To get your own FREE ZDNet Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax, all in one place - sign up today at http://www.zdnetonebox.com %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%