JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB Archives

LIS-ELIB Archives


LIS-ELIB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB Home

LIS-ELIB  September 1999

LIS-ELIB September 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: PubMedCentral

From:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Stevan Harnad <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 23 Sep 1999 09:57:09 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (95 lines)

On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Frank Norman wrote:

> Mark Doyle said:
> 
> > There are two  big hurdles: 1) reducing the cost of handling electronic
> > manuscripts and  2) author/institution/funding agency acceptance of
> > paying submission fees up front.
> 
> Regarding 2), I have heard some concerns that this would unfairly
> penalise the most productive institutions/departments.  Institution
> A producing 500 research papers p.a. will be liable for twice the
> level of charges of less effective Institution B producing only 250
> papers p.a.  This may make the management of Institution A less
> than enthusiastic about such a move towards submssion charges.
> 
> I'd welcome any further insights on this.

See the archives below. There are threads on this issue of "net
provider" vs. "net consumer" libraries and research institutions.

Someone will have to do the arithmetic, but for the moment it has a big
fudge factor in it: What will the page charges actually turn out to be,
per paper, once journal publication has down-sized to providing the
service of Quality-Control/Certification (QC/C) alone?

Andrew Odlyzko estimates about $10-$20 per page.:

    Odlyzko, A.M. (1998) The economics of electronic journals. In:
    Ekman R.  and Quandt, R. (Eds) Technology and Scholarly
    Communication Univ. Calif. Press, 1998.
http://www.research.att.com/~amo/doc/economics.journals.txt

The Journal of High Energy Physics -- which is way ahead of us all in
this, and is in the best position to estimate, being in a field already
softened up for 9 years by LANL self-archiving, and being a refereed,
online-only journal that has already attained what has been informally
estimated as an impact factor of ELEVEN (sic) in what is now only its
thrid year -- estimates that, factoring out one-time start-up costs
that they have already borne, and scaling up to the many journals that
they could handle at much the same cost, rather than just the one they 
do currently, the cost per article is about $300.

http://jhep.cern.ch/

These figures agree. Now do the arithmetic, adding up the total current
serials budgets of "net provider" institutional libraries like Harvard
(which generate more papers than they consume) and "net consumer"
libraries that consume more than they generate. Call that grand amount
$NN.

First of all, it will turn out that the total QC/C cost (averaged
across net providers and net consumers) will be less (perhaps
considerably less) than 1/3 of the current
Subscription/Site-License/Pay-Per-View (S/L/P) expenditure ($NN),
namely, $NN/3.

Now, how does this translate to the individual institution level? Does
Harvard publish so much more than it currently consumes via S/L/P that
it will not be about 2/3 better off, like everyone else? I think 1/3 is a
sufficient buffer so the answer is that it WILL be much better off than
it is now, with its current S/L/P budget. It might not have as much
windfall saving as the less research-active, net-consumer-instititions
(which may well do better than 2/3).

But there are benefits to all that research publication (grants,
prestige, prizes, impact), and the freeing of the research literature
itself will benefit research-active "consumers" much more than inactive
ones (although the enhanced access may also help draw the consumers
into greater productivity -- this will certainly be true in the third
world).

So the arithmetic has to be done, and the causality has to be thought
through, and not narrowly, but broadly, to include all the
ramifications of learned research impact for a learned research
institution.

NOTE: A complete archive of this ongoing discussion of "Freeing the
Refereed Journal Literature Through Online Self-Archiving" is available
at the American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99):

http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stevan Harnad                     [log in to unmask]
Professor of Cognitive Science    [log in to unmask]
Department of Electronics and     phone: +44 23-80 592-582
Computer Science                  fax:   +44 23-80 592-865
University of Southampton         http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/
Highfield, Southampton            http://www.princeton.edu/~harnad/
SO17 1BJ UNITED KINGDOM           



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
February 2022
December 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
May 2021
September 2020
October 2019
March 2019
February 2019
August 2018
February 2018
December 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
June 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
November 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager