----- Original Message -----
From: WCH/EXWCH/POSTMASTER <[log in to unmask]>
To: John Homan <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 1999 8:28 AM
Subject: Mail failure
>
> [005] The mail retry count was exceeded sending to WCH/TRAIN.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> --
> Microsoft Mail v3.0 (MAPI 1.0 Transport) IPM.Microsoft Mail.Note
> From: John Homan
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Singer Stuff
> Date: 1999-09-01 07:50
> Priority: 3
> Message ID: FA4DF96DED5FD311893F0004AC1DCD33
>
>
>
>
> Sorry Judy,
>
> My intention was certainly not to turn your fluid, flexible position into
a
> single sided monument, complete with pedestal. On the contrary, I like to
> re-examine my premises regularly and frequently, and presume that is what
> you had in mind. Am I (again) presuming too much?
>
> rgds, John
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Judy Singer <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 12:43 PM
> Subject: Re: Singer Stuff
>
>
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, John Homan wrote:
> > > :
> > > :> I am on Judy (not related) side
> >
> > On Tue, 31 Aug 1999, Ron Amundsen wrote:
> > > :
> > >
> > > I am on Graham (not related) side. ;-)
> >
> > Being thoroughly postmodern, I reserve the right to switch sides several
> > times before breakfast, in fact I didnt even realise I was "a side" - I
> > dont know whether to be pleased or denounce someone for collapsing me
> > into an artificial dichotomy.
> >
> > Judy
> >
> > PS I got a lot out of reading both Stephen's and Graham's summaries.
> >
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|