JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  September 1999

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM September 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[BRC-NEWS] The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime

From:

"James M. Blaut" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

James M. Blaut

Date:

Fri, 3 Sep 1999 01:19:14 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (174 lines)

-------- Forwarded Message -------- 

Subject: [BRC-NEWS] The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime
Date:    02-Sep-99 at 02:00   
From:    Vieques Libre, INTERNET:viequeslibreiequeslibre.org

TO: INTERNET:brc-newsists.tao.ca 
     http://www.latimes.com/excite/990901/t000077960.html

Los Angeles Times

Wednesday, September 1, 1999

The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime

Justice: President Clinton did the right thing, not the political thing,
in offering clemency to the 'Puerto Rican 16.'

By Bill Press

     There used to be a law in this country: You could only go to jail for
a crime you actually committed. There used to be another law, too: The
severity of the sentence depended on the severity of the crime. Both made
good sense, even to hard-core, law-and-order advocates. But both laws were
suspended in the case of 16 Puerto Rican nationalists arrested and sent to
prison in the early '80s. 

     In one of the rare cases where he has showed leniency, President
Clinton recently offered clemency, under very strict conditions, to the
Puerto Rican 16. 

     His clemency offer was immediately lambasted by Republican leaders
Dick Armey of Texas and Dan Burton of Indiana, who accused the president
of being soft on crime, supporting terrorism and sucking up to Puerto
Ricans only to help his wife's New York Senate campaign. 

     Well, on the issue of clemency, Republicans are wrong, and Clinton 
is right. 

     First, the facts. Granted, the Puerto Rican 16--11 men and five women
--were members of the Armed Forces of National Liberation group (FALN in
its Spanish acronym), the principal Puerto Rican separatist organization,
held responsible for 130 bombings of political and military offices in the
'70s and '80s that killed six people and left dozens injured. But, law
enforcement officers agree, these 16 people were in no way connected to or
responsible for those acts of violence. They were arrested, convicted and
sent to prison for illegal possession of firearms and transporting stolen
vehicles. 

     Nevertheless, all of them received sentences ranging from 35 years to
90 years in prison--more than drug dealers or even some murderers. By any
standard, those sentences are excessive. Thirteen remain in federal
prison; all have served at least 14 years in the slammer. Two years ago,
all 16 released a joint statement renouncing their previous support of
violence. 

     In brief, these men and women were not terrorists then and are not
now. They were simply given a terrorist's sentence and have served a
terrorist's time. 

     Given the severity of their sentences and the length of time served,
clemency is clearly deserved, especially since Puerto Rican nationalists
convicted of far more serious crimes--opening fire on the U.S. House of
Representatives and plotting to kill President Harry Truman--were pardoned
by President Carter in 1977 and 1979 without conditions. 

     In fact, if there is any valid criticism of Clinton's action, it is
the conditions on clemency he imposed. Before the Puerto Rican 16 taste
freedom, they must first request clemency in writing, publicly renounce
violence, agree to meet with parole officers once a month and never meet
with anyone with a criminal record. This means they can't even visit each
other--two in the group are sisters--or discuss Puerto Rican independence
with other former FALN members. No wonder they did not jump to accept
Clinton's offer. Like the sentences they received, the proposed conditions
are excessive. Based on the facts, Clinton should simply grant clemency,
no strings attached. 

     Of course, the most absurd charge of all is that Clinton's clemency
offer is a cheap political trick to help wife Hillary's Senate campaign.
True, the man is not above cheap political tricks. But this is not one 
of them. 

     The Hillary charge ignores the fact that legal review of this case
has been under way for six years, long before Hillary Clinton dreamed of
becoming a candidate. It also ignores the fact that President Clinton was
asked to grant clemency by a host of world leaders, including Carter,
South African Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Cardinal John O'Connor of New
York--hardly members of Hillary Clinton's steering committee. 

     Finally, it ignores the reality that Clinton's clemency offer didn't
satisfy anybody in the Puerto Rican community--neither opponents of
independence, who want them to remain in prison, or supporters of
independence, who want them released with no conditions. It didn't even
satisfy the Puerto Rican 16. If this is Clinton's way of helping Hillary,
he should be made to cease and desist. 

     No, as strange as it may seem, in offering clemency to the Puerto
Rican 16, Bill Clinton did not do the political thing. He did the right
thing. 

--

Bill Press, Former Chairman of the California Democratic Party, is 
Co-host of CNN's "Crossfire." 

Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved


[Articles on BRC-NEWS may be forwarded and posted on other mailing
lists/discussion forums, as long as proper attribution is given to the
author and originating publication, and the wording is not altered in
any way. In particular, if there is a reference to a web site where an
article was originally located, please do *not* remove that.

Unless stated otherwise, do *not* publish or post the entire text of any
copyrighted articles on web sites (web-based discussion forums exempted)
or in print, without getting *explicit* permission from the article author
or copyright holder. Check the fair use provisions of the copyright law in
your country for details on what you can and can't do.

As a courtesy, we'd appreciate it if you let folks know how to subscribe
to BRC-NEWS, by leaving in the first two lines of the signature below.]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
BRC-NEWS: Black Radical Congress - General News/Alerts/Announcements
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe: Email "subscribe brc-news" to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: Email "unsubscribe brc-news" to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Digest: Email "subscribe brc-news-digest" to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion: Email "subscribe brc-all" to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Press Releases: Email "subscribe brc-press" to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archive: http://www.egroups.com/group/brc-news (The first time, you need
to "Join" and set your preferences to "Read on the Web")
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions/Problems: Send email to <[log in to unmask]>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.blackradicalcongress.org    | BRC |    [log in to unmask]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------




----------------------- Internet Header --------------------------------
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Received: from lists.tao.ca (lists.tao.ca [198.96.117.181])
	by hpamgaaa.compuserve.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/HP-1.8) with ESMTP id CAA29400;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 02:59:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from lists@localhost)
	by lists.tao.ca (8.9.3/TAO6) id CAA32133
	for brc-news-outgoing; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 02:56:58 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 02:56:58 -0400
Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
X-Authentication-Warning: lists.tao.ca: lists set sender to [log in to unmask] using -f
From: Vieques Libre <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [BRC-NEWS] The Punishment Did Not Fit the Crime
Sender: [log in to unmask]
Precedence: bulk
To: [log in to unmask]
X-Sender: Vieques Libre <[log in to unmask]>
X-WWW-Site: http://www.blackradicalcongress.org/

 


 


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager