JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO Archives

PHYSIO Archives


PHYSIO@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO Home

PHYSIO  September 1999

PHYSIO September 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FOOT-BALLING

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 24 Sep 1999 00:38:52 EDT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (96 lines)

The ever supersensitive reaction to any serious or lighthearted critique of
Ball training by some folk makes one rather suspicious that its supporters
actually are rather insecure about its real value.

While most of us probably have no argument with its many years of well-proven
therapeutic and recreational applications by physical therapists and physical
educators since its earliest use in Germany (not Switzerland), there is still
no scientific or practical evidence that Ball usage makes any unique and
efficient contribution to the training of serious athletes. In this context,
the term "efficient" applies to the actual performance benefits achieved for
a given expenditure of time.

In other words, if Ball training is to be deemed to be efficient, then it has
to be shown that time spent on Ball training is equal or superior to other
forms of supplementary training. This is where a great deal of doubt has
been raised in previous discussions and Ball proponents have so far done
nothing to dispel concerns that time spent on Ball training could be better
devoted elsewhere.

QUO VADIS, BALL?

Now, it is quite amazing that nobody has yet produced any evidence of the
value of Ball training, because it is not at all demanding to set up
experiments to compare the progress of athletes using the Ball and those
using other methods of supplementary training. Why has so much time passed
without any such experimental proof emerging to prove all those claims that
Ball training indeed improves motor control and balance in functional
sporting movements?

Will it ever? So far, the indications are that Ball training, like all those
situp and home gym devices one sees on infomercials, will continue for many
years to offer some trendy movement variations for easily bored clients who
need to do some trunk work or limited dumbbell exercises.

Extrapolating from evidence that is emerging from considerable research into
the nature of motor control (which I summarised ages ago on the rate and
degree of correction of deviations from regions of temporary stability), I
would deduce that it is highly unlikely that Ball training to will ever be
proved to equal that of well-tried traditional methods for enhancing balance
and motor control. This hypothesised role will remain one used predominantly
by the average personal training client and not the elite athlete.

Sure, the Ball has a role to play in more casual exercise and rehabilitation,
as it has for years before the current Ball enthusiasts were even born, but
the claims being made for its role in creating elite athletes will not be
realised if its users persist in trying to apply where other methods are very
well established and far more efficient.

Even if one uses the Ball for a mere 15 minutes in a lifting session, that is
typically the duration of a typical strength training module of many
Bulgarian and Russian programmes and one rarely can afford to lose such
valuable time on adjunct experiments that have attracted no scientific or
high level practical support whatsoever yet.

BALL OF THE FOOT BALANCE ("SIFFIES")

When I offer balancing strategies, one of the very basic methods that I use
actually does involve a special type of 'Ball' training - the Balls of the
feet! What I do is simply have athletes execute weight training movements
while balanced on the balls of the feet (an article on this appears this week
in a popular fitness magazine - its author, rather against my protestations,
has called these methods, "Siffies" - I can provide further details to anyone
who may be interested).

Anyway, I sometimes call this method lightheartedly "Foot-Balling" or BOFFING
(Ball Of Foot balancing). Whatever one may call it, I have found this
technique extremely valuable in teaching the motor skills of weightlifting
and powerlifting, as well as during various phases of lower extremity and
trunk rehabilitation.

So, if one is executing a clean pull, lunge, curls, upright rows, high
pulls, good mornings, overhead snatch squats or conventional squats, etc, one
simply balances on the balls of the feet at crucial stages of the exercise
or during all of the exercise. One can apply this Ball of the Foot balancing
method to a large number of popular exercises from Weightlifting,
Powerlifting and Bodybuilding, so the possibilities are enormous.

I have many variations on this theme, including the use of different
footwear, drills with partners, varying rates of change of action and changes
in apparatus, but this brief overview should suffice to teach you how to
incorporate free, efficient, safe balance training into your normal training
session. Best of all, one carries those Foot-Balls with you everywhere,
they cost nothing and they occupy no storage space!

Dr Mel C Siff
Denver, USA
[log in to unmask]
 






%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
March 2024
February 2024
December 2023
October 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
May 2022
December 2021
November 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
September 2020
July 2020
April 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager