I find the current discussion on design theory really interesting and would
like to add another angle.
It seems to me that the assumption in this thread so far, is that we need a
sort of scientific theory of design to help us design better, but another
possibility is to develop critical theories of design that might allow
designers to adopt more radical social roles and political positions through
their practice.
In The Idea of a Critical Theory. (Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. 1981) Geuss
writes:
'Scientific theories have as their aim or goal successful manipulation of
the external world; they have instrumental use. If correct, they enable the
agents who have mastered them to cope effectively with the environment and
thus pursue their chosen ends successfully. Critical theories aim at
emancipation and enlightenment, at making agents aware of hidden coercion,
thereby freeing them from that coercion and putting them in a position to
determine where their true interests lie'. ( p55-56)
I would be really interested to hear what others have to say about this
distinction between scientific and critical theories in relation to design.
And, if anyone knows of any research being carried out into relationships
between design and political ideology.
Thank you and best wishes,
Anthony Dunne
Senior Tutor
Industrial & Furniture Design
Royal College of Art
Kensington Gore
London SW7 2EU
UK
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|