The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  August 1999

DISABILITY-RESEARCH August 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Braille Olympics Information - Discrimination Complaint

From:

Frank Hall-Bentick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 03 Aug 1999 23:11:40 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (259 lines)

Friends,

Please email & fax
Mr Sandy Hollway
Chief Executive of SOCOG
emailto:[log in to unmask] .
The telephone number is 61-2-9297-2000, Fax: 61-2-9297-2020.

to support Bruce's concern and ensure an accessible Olympics.

Frank Hall-Bentick
President
Disability Australia
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Bruce Maguire wrote:
emailto:[log in to unmask]>

> August 3, 1999
>
> Greetings Everyone
>
> This message is being posted to a number of electronic discussion
> lists in an effort to reach as many people as possible. Please
> feel free to forward it to whomever else you think might be
> interested.
>
> I have divided this fairly long message into three parts:
> firstly, a summary of the main points; secondly, a detailed
> account of the events surrounding my complaint against SOCOG
> alleging discrimination on the grounds of disability; and,
> thirdly, a discussion of what seem to me to be the broader social
> and political issues arising from the complaint.
>
> A.      Summary
>
> I continue to be amazed and very encouraged at how many people
> have become aware of my ongoing campaign to obtain information
> about the 2000 Olympic Games in braille. For those who are not
> familiar with the background, a brief summary follows:
> 1) On June 7, I lodged a complaint under the Australian
> Commonwealth Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) against the
> Sydney Organising Committee for the Olympic Games (SOCOG). The
> complaint alleges that SOCOG have discriminated against me on the
> grounds of my disability by failing to provide me with the
> Olympics Ticket Book in braille.
>
> 2) Two days later on June 9, we lodged an application with the
> Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) for an
> Interim Determination pending the final resolution of the
> complaint.
>
> 3) On June 24, the Commission granted the application, ruling
> that SOCOG were to preserve my right to purchase tickets for the
> Olympic Games after the deadline of July 16.
> 4) SOCOG subsequently indicated that they would not comply with
> this Interim Determination.
>
> 5) After considering various options, I decided to refer the
> matter to a Public Hearing at the Human Rights and Equal
> Opportunity Commission, which is scheduled for September. At this
> hearing, all the substantive issues of the complaint will be
> addressed.
>
> B.      Detailed Background to My Complaint
>
> On May 30, print copies of the Official Olympic Games Ticket Book
> were distributed in newspapers across Australia.
>
> On May 31 I telephoned the Sydney Organising Committee for the
> Olympic Games (SOCOG) to request a braille copy of the Official
> Olympic Games Ticket Book, and also a braille copy of the
> Souvenir Programme, which can be ordered through the Ticket Book.
> I was aware that the Olympics Co-ordinating Authority (OCA) has,
> for some years, maintained an access committee to advise it on
> aspects of physical access to Olympics venues, and I hoped that
> SOCOG would have been aware of issues such as the importance of
> making public information available in alternative formats such
> as braille. As a blind person, I use braille as my primary means
> of literacy, and I find it to be the only effective way of
> gaining access to complex formats such as tables and charts -
> which form a significant component of the Olympics Ticket Book.
> There are numerous precedents for having public information
> available in braille: braille telephone bills and bank statements
> are produced in Australia, and information about major festivals,
> as well as cricket and football fixtures, is produced regularly
> in braille. Most recently, information relating to the Telstra
> share offer is being produced in braille.
>
> SOCOG had not made any of its information available in braille,
> and it soon became apparent that they were not prepared to do so.
> They told me in no uncertain terms that I would have to get
> someone else to read me the Ticket Book.
>
> Accordingly, I lodged a complaint under Australia's Commonwealth
> Disability Discrimination Act (DDA), alleging discrimination by
> SOCOG against me on the grounds of my disability because they
> would not provide me with information in braille, and so they
> were treating me less favourably than sighted people. The
> complaint also alleged that SOCOG were being discriminatory
> because their Worldwide Web site does not conform to the
> accessibility guidelines developed by the W3C Consortium, which
> means that it is inaccessible to me in significant respects.
>
> Shortly after I lodged the complaint, Blind Citizens Australia,
> acting on my behalf, lodged an application with the Human Rights
> and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC) for an Interim
> Determination. We did this because it was our understanding that
> the deadline for ordering Olympic Games tickets using the Ticket
> Book was July 16, and it was unlikely that HREOC would be able to
> deal with the substantive issues of my complaint before then.
>
> As a direct result of my complaint, SOCOG established a telephone
> line for blind and vision-impaired people to use, and they
> claimed that the operators were prepared to read the entire
> Ticket Book if necessary. They also noted, however, that it would
> take 410 minutes to read the book from beginning to end, and I
> argued that it was unreasonable to expect me or anyone else to
> absorb information about schedules and prices over such an
> extended period of time, especially without any possibility of
> reviewing it later. Readers of print were not expected to do
> this.
>
> The application for an Interim Determination was successful. In
> its reasons for granting the application, the Commission noted
> that there was a more than arguable case that discrimination had
> occurred and that the telephone line was no substitute for a
> braille copy of the Ticket Book. The Interim Determination
> required SOCOG to allow me to purchase tickets after July 16 on
> the same basis as I would have been able to do before that date,
> pending the final hearing of the complaint by the Commission.
>
> SOCOG refused to comply with the Commission's Interim
> Determination. Because of a separation of powers between the
> judicial and administrative branches of Australian government,
> HREOC decisions are not of themselves legally binding. In order
> to enforce the Interim Determination, it would have been
> necessary for me to begin proceedings in the Federal Court. Such
> action would have incurred substantial costs, and had the Federal
> Court ruled against enforcement of the Interim Determination, I
> would have been required to pay SOCOG's costs. I am in no
> financial position to do this, and so I decided that the risk of
> Federal Court action was too great. I decided, instead, to refer
> my complaint to a Public Hearing, which will take place at the
> Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission in September this
> year. At this Hearing, all the substantive issues arising from my
> complaint will be dealt with.
>
> The current situation is that SOCOG still have not provided in
> braille any information relating to the Olympics Games. A few
> days before the July 16 deadline, they provided some information
> in electronic form, but this is not my preferred format for
> reading, and is not, for me, a substitute for braille. As a
> result, I was not in a position to purchase any tickets to the
> Olympic Games. I await the Public Hearing in September, but I am
> aware that even if I am successful, Federal Court action may
> still be necessary should SOCOG choose not to comply.
>
> C.      Borader Issues
>
> The campaign to gain access in braille to public information
> disseminated by SOCOG has been much more demanding of my time and
> emotional energy than I envisaged, and is being waged against a
> backdrop of remarkable and unnecessary intransigence on the part
> of SOCOG who will probably - if they have not done so already -
> spend more on legal costs than they would have had they agreed to
> provide me with braille in the first place. Nevertheless, I feel
> that my complaint raises a number of very important issues for
> those of us who have disabilities, and so I believe that it has
> been, and will continue to be, worth pursuing vigorously:
>
> a) Firstly, I believe I should have the right to be able to read
> information in the same way that anyone else is able to do.
> Braille is the closest I can ever get to print, and it is the way
> I read and write. In telling me that I can get someone else to
> read the book, SOCOG are, in effect, saying that I do not have
> the right to read information as others do. It is similar to
> telling a person in a wheelchair that someone else can carry them
> into a building because a ramp will not be provided.
>
> b) There is a need to broaden the traditional public
> conceptualisation of access from access to physical space, to
> encompass access to information. It is, of course, very important
> to have good physical access, but access to information about
> cultural and sporting events is no less important. Blindness is,
> in many ways, an information disability, and in seeking
> independent access to information in braille, I am making a claim
> about my fundamental human right to have access to, and to be
> fully a part of, the community and all its facilities and
> resources.
>
> c) Recently, the world celebrated the 30th anniversary of the
> Apollo 11 moon landing on July 20, 1969. Like most people who
> were old enough to remember this event, I have clear memories of
> where I was and what I was doing when Neil Armstrong set foot on
> the moon. The Olympic Games is an event that will be unique in
> the lives of most Australians - certainly it is most unlikely
> that Australia will host the Games again in my lifetime. In years
> to come, Australians will reflect on the events surrounding the
> Olympic Games, and they will use tangible, written information
> such as the Ticket Book and the Souvenir Programme to act as
> mementoes. I believe that I have as much right to have tangible
> mementoes of the Olympic Games as anyone else.
>
> d) As a father of two sighted children, I am trying to provide a
> positive image of disability. I cherish the hope that they will
> grow up with the belief - confirmed through their observations of
> my life - that people with disabilities can and do partake of the
> full quota of rights, responsibilities and benefits of
> citizenship. I wanted to be able to demonstrate that I could play
> an active role in ordering Olympic Games tickets, just as other
> fathers of other children have done.
>
> e) The possibility of recourse to Federal Court action raises an
> important issue about the feasibility of an individual with
> meagre financial resources being able to prosecute a complaint
> against a large organisation with millions of dollars at its
> disposal. Without financial assistance I simply could not
> initiate proceedings in the Federal Court, and I would be
> bankrupted should I be required to pay the other party's costs.
> SOCOG, on the other hand, have large amounts of financial
> resources, and it is ironic to note that those who ordered
> tickets using the Ticket Book could elect to make a donation to
> SOCOG. Those of us who live in Australia need to be active in
> lobbying politicians to secure a more equitable way of handling
> the issue of costs in the Federal Court insofar as they relate to
> the resolution of DDA complaints.
>
> Finally, I want to thank all those people who have directly or
> indirectly shown their support for me. I have received quite a
> few messages of encouragement from around the world. I know, too,
> that many people have contacted SOCOG to express their
> disappointment that SOCOG have chosen to adopt such an
> uncompromising position. I remain convinced that community
> pressure can make a difference, and so I would welcome any
> legitimate initiatives that might persuade SOCOG to rectify their
> failure to provide me with braille information, and to make their
> Web site fully accessible. The Chief Executive of SOCOG is Sandy
> Hollway, and his email address is [log in to unmask] .
> The telephone number is 02-9297-2000, Fax: 02-9297-2020.
>
> Please feel free to contact me, either by email or telephone
> (Sydney, 02-9639-5346) if you would like more information, or if
> you would like to discuss any of the issues I have raised in this
> email.
>
> Sincerely
> Bruce Maguire
> [log in to unmask]
> Ph: 02-9639-5346
>
> To signoff the OZADVOCACY list:
> Send the command: signoff OZADVOCACY
> mailto:[log in to unmask]



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager