Am I the only person on this List to be inconvenienced by receiving such a
large (529K) unsolicited message and attachment?
I am blessed by my employers with quite an efficient machine, but receiving
this unsolicited message, for the second time, still clogged matters up
seriously.
Please, E. Hume, if offering this questionaire again, invite prospective
respondents to contact you for separate transmission of its text.
D.M. Ogier
----------
>From: E Hume <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: Cataloguing digital collections
>Date: Mon, Jun 14, 1999, 9:02 pm
>
> I recently submitted a request to the list for information concerning
> information retrieval for digital collections, particularly with
> material with a local studies/archive content.
>
> Unfortunately, sorry to say very little new information was received as
> a result of this question, certainly not enough to circulate to the
> list,
> [ Section: 1/1 File: QUESTIONNAIRE.doc UUencoded by: Turnpike Version 4.01 ]
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|