At 11:46 AM -0400 6/21/99, --Scott Decatur wrote:
> I am looking for information and discussion on eye movement as it
>relates to what people are thinking (NLP)
Scott,
There's actually quite a few studies showing that Neurolinguistic
Programming's eye-movement hypothesis is incorrect, and almost none showing
that is IS correct.
Curiously, much of this gets published in Perceptual and Motor Skills.
cf.
Wertheim, E. H., Habib, C., & Cumming, G. (1986). Test of the
neurolinguistic programming hypothesis that eye-movements relate to
processing imagery. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62(2), 523-529.
Neurolinguistic Programming should probably not be considered a
scientifically validated method of determining "what people are thinking."
-spivey
____________________________________________________________
Michael Spivey, Asst. Prof. office: 250 Uris Hall
Dept. of Psychology phone:(607)255-9365
Cornell University FAX:(607)255-8433
Ithaca, NY 14853 email:[log in to unmask]
OFFICE HOURS: Wed. 2-3:30
http://www.psych.cornell.edu/Psychology/spivey/
"One level of description's distributed representation
is another level of description's localist representation."
____________________________________________________________
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|