JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  June 1999

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM June 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: : FW: Lacrosse is an elitist sport?

From:

David Crouch <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 8 Jun 1999 09:36:16 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (146 lines)

Barry Konkin,

I continue to be pleased at the mushrooming of discussion around 
elite/non-elite/other/halfway of these activities and I am glad of a 
discussion that opens this up from labels that preclude too much 
debate. 

But the point I seek to make here is that there is an unhelpful 
delimitation of the discourse if we confine within even a notion of 
plurality of labels, when we should be thinking of processes.

I too am confounded by the still-smothering coverage of Class in this 
debate. It is the `still-smothering` bit that I mean, not that it 
should be significant- not least in terms of native American peoples 
alongside others. There is a much more complex cultural debate around 
these things. How does the emerging `bedroom comuntiy` [?] feel 
about/cope with the other ways/contexts of practicing the game, how 
does it festure in the lives of diferent rgoups through the complexity 
of practices, knowledges, iedntities, empowerments they use, how does 
all this inter-cut and connect with webs of power and control....

David Crouch
cultural geography Anglia University UK.


On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 10:05:00 -0700 "Konkin, Barry" 
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> 
> From: Konkin, Barry
> To: R Evans, School for Policy Studies
> Subject: Re: Lacrosse is an elitist sport?
> Date: Friday, June 04, 1999 9:20AM
> 
> Rhys:
> 
> it's interesting to talk of the appropriation of certain activities by
> groups such as the so-called 'elites' of the Ivy League schools on the east
> Coast of the US (Harvard, Cornell, etc.) It sounds like a similar
> demographic has adopted the sport in England.
> 
> I'd like to point out that in certain places, while lacrosse is a working
> class sport, in my experience, in Saanich (a then-agricultural community
> evolving into a bedroom community) and Esquimalt (the site of the largest
> naval base on the West Coast of Canada, and very much a working-class
> municipality) on Vancouver Island, it is a strongly Aboriginal game.  These
> two communities both have at least two large reserves within their
> boundaries.  The youth box lacrosse matches I watched were often clearly
> influenced/directed by racial interactions, as the aboriginal youth often
> took the opportunity to 'give back' to the white youths they faced on the
> court.
> 
> In other communities such as Surrey, the Indo-Canadian population has begun
> to produce good lacrosse players as well, but in a strongly suburban
> 'bedroom community', rather than a working class environment.  The
> Indo-Canadian community in Surrey developed around an agricultural base, as
> any new immigrants to Canada became farmers in the community.  However, this
> has changed dramatically in the last decade, as the Indo-Canadian community
> has become strongly urbanized.
> 
> I think that to define a sport such as lacrosse in polarized terms such as
> 'working class' or 'elitist' is simplistic, and we should perhaps consider
> these activities  along a range of 'labels', recognizing that  the locale in
> which we examine activities such as sport exerts a strong influence on its
> character.
> 
> Barry Konkin
> Planning & Development Department
> City of Surrey
> Surrey BC
> Canada
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
>  --------
> From: R Evans, School for Policy Studies
> To: Robert Campbell
> Cc: [log in to unmask]; [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Lacrosse is an elitist sport?
> Date: Friday, June 04, 1999 6:51AM
> 
> Robert,
> 
> Having grown up on Canada's West Coast, I would like to reinforce what
> you have said about lacrosse.  I was absolutely gobsmacked to see what
> _we_ thought of as _our_ game being appropriated by a bunch of upper
> middle class English snobs/professional American jocks/whatever.
> 
> It is too funny to think of lacrosse as being played by varsity or
> other teams.  What's next? Designer face masks?  High tech jock
> protectors?  Non=-contact lacrosse? I grew up in a very poor community
> and box lacrosse (played indoors in a dry hockey arena or community
> hall) was a community sport. If i remember right the teams were named
> things like New Westminster Salmonbellies (or was that the hockey team
> only?).  Our team was the Bridgeview Bulldogs (usually changed to
> Bridgeview Bastards).  Looking back, the game occupied a similar place
> in our society that `hurling'(Sp?) does in Eire -- it was an extremely
> rough game, with lots of contact --watch out for that stick! -- which
> prepared boys for working-class lives in jobs which constantly hurt
> their bodies -- sawmill work, truckdrivers, labourers, etc.  The game
> was resolutely amateur, even when semi-pro.  And the teams definately
> functioned as nodes of community spirit/identity.
> 
> Wondering what purpose such a game might have amongst academics and
> middle-class professional sports people makes me think that one aspect
> of what we have here is an appropriation of working-class authenticity
>  -- the use of formerly working-class signifiers like denim jeans, blues
> music or Doc Maartins boots by the hegemonic class fractions.
> Distinction indeed!  As one who has very little time for commercialised
> sports, i frankly find this locker-room -- sorry, coffee-room talk --
> rather off-putting.  It is almost as if the speakers are desperately
> brandishing symbols to show that they are not elite, not privileged,
> and using it to hide the cultural capital (=power) which they mobilise
> every day in the course of their work.
> 
> But of course, that is rather extreme of me.  Certainly there is an
> attraction to losing oneself in physicality, teamwork and being
> successful at it.  And of course, the above analysis operates on the
> level of the collective, not the individual -- let's not get caught in
> the ecological fallacy here.
> 
> Still, i always found lacrosse to be brutish, punishing and extremely
> violent.  How strange to find it appearing in the context of academic
> geography....
> 
> regards
> 
> rhys evans
> 
> ****************
> note new address:
>  ----------------------
> R Evans, School for Policy Studies
> 8 Priory Rd., Bristol BS8 1TZ
> (0117 9546984)
> [log in to unmask]

----------------------
David Crouch
Anglia Polytechnic University
[log in to unmask]



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager