Sarah,
The key, then, is `not just`. I am very involved in areas or pockets of
changing poitical processes, but the polarising debate around much of
the lacrossenetwork [very important though it is] anticipates much
changing without much understanding.
David
On Tue, 8 Jun 1999 12:13:09 +0000 Sarah Batterbury
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> David,
>
> >From an action research perspective I would argue that the key is
> not just to explore how these things relate but also to formulate a
> methodology (if it is possible) for change ie its a question of what
> we can do about it not just understanding the processes.
>
> Sarah
>
>
> >
> > Yes, but the key issue is to explore how the `two` [if they can so
> > polarised] relate; their relative significance, etc. That does not in
> > any way deny an important sphere of eontestation concerning power in
> > the production of consumption, that is however not to be confused with
> > the sense people make of things, practices.
> >
> >
> >
> > David Crouch
> > cultural geography, anglia university
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 5 Jun 1999 18:44:09 +0100 (BST) Simon Batterbury
> > <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I shoudl say that despite my personal lack of interest in commercialised,
> > > competitive sport I did teach joint sports studies/geography students for
> > > the last five years and have supervised several dissertations on sports
> > > topics. Again, it is not
> > > the social networks, the performance or the achievement that bothers me
> > > but its commodification and exclusionary practices.
> > >
> > > On Sat, 5 Jun 1999, K.Browne wrote:
> >
> > ----------------------
> > David Crouch
> > Anglia Polytechnic University
> > [log in to unmask]
> >
>
>
----------------------
David Crouch
Anglia Polytechnic University
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|