JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS Archives


FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS Archives

FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS Archives


FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS Home

FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS Home

FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS  May 1999

FINANCE-AND-PHYSICS May 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

more on historical vs implied distributions

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 19 May 1999 19:49:20 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (94 lines)



I would like to add a few points to the relative importance of historical and
implied distribtions

(1) it is the future - not the past - historical distribution that matters
======================================================
of course the price of an option depends on the distribution of the returns;
even more, it depends on the returns itself and in which order they appear, ie
the entire path. unfortunately none of these things is known. making certain
hypothesis allows us to extrapolate future scenarios from past observations, but
this is always subjective.

being rational physicists, all of us will probably disagree with 'momentum
investors' who essentially assume that a stock will go up tomorrow because it
will go up today. even worse is probably the wizardry of chartists with all
these resistance lines, channels and oscillators. however - projecting past
distributions into the future is more or less doing the same thing, just a bit
more sophisticated (and maybe for that actually more 'true')

I however agree that if we would know the future distribution of returns  we
would have an amazing tools to price options - but so would we if we could
predict the final spot



(2) market makers use implied vol, short term traders use implied and
historical, long term trader use ????
========================================================================================
let us do some bourbaki and define terms before use: an 'option market maker' is
someone who is trading options but who is not taking a vega position, ie as soon
as he is given a  position he is going to square it.  for this trader all that
matters is the current implied distribution, and the historical distribution of
the underlying market is completely irrelevant.

a short term trader (gamma trader) is a trader who can buy and sell derivative
securities with a very short tem horizon in a frequency that allows him to have
a significant number of maturing trades during his evaluation period. an example
is a forex trader where very short maturities (even over night !) are common.
assuming a certain stationarity of the returns a trader can actually play the
higher moments, for example by selling the butterfly (wings against money, a
play on the fourth moment - see Nassim Taleb's book for more details) and if his
assumption about the relation between implied and historical distribution is
right, he will actually make money in the long run.

a long term trader (vega trader) is a trader trading products whose maturity is
much longer than his evaluation period. he does not really care about historical
distributions but rather about the markets perception of future distribtion
INCLUDING RISK PREMIUMS because at one point he will have to sell his position
(or marking it to market, which in  this context is more or less the same thing)


======================================
to conclude I think the past historical distribution is a proxy benchmark,
similar to the past performance of a stock. knowing nothing else it makes sense
to assume that future distribution will look similar, and obvious discrepencies
between implied and historical distributions can give rise to trading decisions
similar to the rich / cheap analyis in bonds. the question which distribution
matters, depends on the actual question studied, but  I would assume it safe to
say that both distributions together are important for most problems.

s














-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is confidential; its contents do not constitute a 
commitment by Paribas except where provided for in a written agreement 
between you and Paribas. Any unauthorised disclosure, use or 
dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. If you are not 
the intended recipient of the message, please notify the sender 
immediately. 

Ce message est confidentiel ; son contenu ne représente en aucun cas un 
engagement de la part de Paribas sous réserve de tout accord conclu par 
écrit entre vous et Paribas. Toute publication, utilisation ou 
diffusion, même partielle, doit être autorisée préalablement. Si vous 
n'êtes pas destinataire de ce message, merci d'en avertir immédiatement 
l'expéditeur.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
March 2023
July 2022
May 2022
March 2022
October 2021
August 2021
November 2020
September 2020
July 2020
February 2020
January 2020
September 2019
July 2019
April 2019
March 2019
January 2019
October 2018
September 2018
July 2018
February 2018
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
October 2016
September 2016
July 2016
May 2016
April 2016
January 2016
September 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
October 2014
September 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
November 2013
September 2013
August 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
September 2012
July 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
May 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
April 2009
December 2008
November 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
September 2007
August 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager