Well, either claim is absurdly reductionist and deserves investigaiton.
Tourism means lots of things, in any stage of `development`, and so can
have lots of different effects. Sustainability is equally slippery, but
can be of positive value in the ways to which you are alluding.
very best,
Prof David Crouch, Anglia Univ
On Tue, 04 May 1999 15:34:53 +0100 Graham Gardner <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Neither do I - in fact, I'd argue that tourism was a major OBSTACLE to
> development (that is, development defined apart from the requirements of
> tourists and capital...)
>
> Graham Gardner
> IGES University of Wales, Aberystwyth
>
>
>
> At 05:12 PM 5/1/99 +0200, you wrote:
> >In reply to this very brief statement by Robert Morgan, my answer is that I
> >do not agree.
> >
> >Michael Davie
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>From: "Robert Morgan" <[log in to unmask]>
> >>To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >>X-Unsub: To leave, send text 'leave crit-geog-forum' to
> >>[log in to unmask]
> >>Sender: [log in to unmask]
> >>Precedence: list
> >>
> >>
> >>The tourism is the only way to development of the third world.
> >
> >>
> >
> >*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@@*@*@*
> >Michael F. DAVIE [log in to unmask]
> >Professeur
> >Directeur du DEA "Espaces, Societes et Villes dans le Monde Arabe"
> >UMR 6592 URBAMA (Urbanisation dans le Monde Arabe)
> >Universite Francois-Rabelais
> >23 rue de la Loire, B.P. 7521, 37075 Tours Cedex 2 (France)
> >Tel : (+33) 02 47 36 84 67 Fax : (+33) 02 47 36 84 71
> >*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@*@@*@*@*
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
----------------------
David Crouch
Anglia Polytechnic University
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|