I've got a guy starting in a couple of weeks who could, under my supervision,
amend the W3C Note, if the DC community can agree on what additional
functionality it wants. See:
http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
http://www.iso.ch/markete/8601.pdf
Misha
> The issue of whether the W3C profile of ISO8601 is too restrictive (it does
> not accommodate date ranges) has been raised before.
>
> If this is the only obvious deficiency, perhaps it is worth the effort to
> amend WTN8601.
>
> Of course, others may choose to use a full ISO 8601 scheme as a qualifier,
> but I think as a general community standard, the simpler one is more likely
> to serve us better.
>
> Is there anyone among those who require this additional capability who might
> be willing to invest in revising the WTN 8601 standard? Misha Wolf of
> Reuters is the author of the profile, but I also know he is very busy at the
> moment and may not be able to participate.
>
> stu
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|