Constanze Witt wrote:
>
> A story worthy of Hollywood continues ... the following appeared in the
> Berliner Morgenpost today, and has already been mentioned on the arch-de
> list.
> Whatever led to the interpretation as "adulteress"?? Is there anything in
> the archaeological record that would indicate this? I can imagine that,
> with living suspects, police could do DNA tests and such, but even there I
> would think that proving multiple sexual partners and adultery would be
> very difficult. Are we dealing again with archaeologists' personal feelings
> imposed on the finds -- what Gebühr calls here "being victims of their own
> wishful thinking"?
> If this has already been discussed on arch-theory, please refer.
[snip article in German]
IIRC the theory that Winderby girl could have been an adulteress comes
from the (partial?) shaving of her head.
--
Chris Hatt
USER ERROR: Replace user and press any key to continue...
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|