The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  March 1999

DISABILITY-RESEARCH March 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Accessibility Evaluation

From:

Chetz Colwell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 26 Mar 1999 14:58:59 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (163 lines)

Apologies if you receive multiple copies of this message.

As part of a study which is evaluating the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines of the Web Accessibility Initiative, people who are blind or
visually impaired are invited to test the accessibility of some web pages.

This is the second stage of the study.  In the first stage web page authors
were asked to create an accessible web page using the Guidelines.  This has
provided some insight into the ease-of-use of the Guidelines, and I now
want to evaluate the accessibility for visually impaired people of the
pages the authors created.  The pages have therefore been put on a web
site.  The evaluation mainly involves viewing different examples and
reporting which were found to be more accessible. The address of the site
is: http://phoenix.herts.ac.uk/sdru/test/

Instructions for testing the pages:
The web site contains examples of various web elements such as: images,
imagemaps, forms, frames, tables, and different approaches to the
presentation of article headers and references.  The task involves viewing
all the examples of a particular element, such as images, then answering a
few questions about which example was the most accessible for you, and why.
You can evaluate as many elements as you like, in any order.  If you do not
have time to do all of them it would be useful if you could start with the
tables, forms and frames.

The questions are listed at the end of this message, and are also available
on the web site.  For the tables there are additional questions which
require you to interrogate the tables in order to find an answer.

You can use any one of a variety of strategies for entering the answers and
sending them in, for example: create a reply to this message, or save this
message as a text file; or save the questions from the web page as a text
file.  You may wish to switch between your browser and email package to
answer the questions, or make notes and enter the answers after viewing all
the elements.  All answers will be kept confidential.

Please send the answers to Chetz Colwell <[log in to unmask]>.  If you
receive this message via a mailing list, please do not send answers to the
list (otherwise I cannot be responsible for their confidentiality).

I am a research student at the Sensory Disabilities Research Unit of the
University of Hertfordshire, UK.  Please contact me if you require any
further information, or if you need assistance with testing the pages, or
if you are interested in the results of the study.  Contact details are
provided at the end of this message.

Thank you very much for your time and effort.

----
Questions:
Thank you for taking the time to evaluate these pages.  The 14 questions
are listed below and are also available on the web site.  Please send your
answers to Chetz Colwell <[log in to unmask]>.

The answers you provide will remain confidential: your name or email
address will not be associated with your answers.  The results from this
study may be published, but all participants will remain anonymous.

Please note that the questions for tables are slightly different to those
for other elements.  You will need to interrogate each table in order to
find an answer which will be different for each table.

About you and your computer:
1) How long have you been using the Web?

2) How many times do you use the Web per month on average?

3) Which browser did you use to view the pages for this evaluation?
Which version?

4) Which screenreader did you use?
Which version?

5) Did you use a speech synthesiser?
If so which one?

6) Did you use a Braille display?
If so which one?

7) Which operating system did you use?
DOS, Windows, or Other.
Which version?

Questions for elements:
8) Imagemaps.
Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, or Example 2.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the imagemaps.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the imagemaps.

9) Tables.
Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, Example 4, Example 5, or None were accessible.
If you were able to access the tables, please answer the following question
for each example: What size was the 2 cm sphere perceived to be with the
outside presentation?
Example 1:
Example 2:
Example 3:
Example 4:
Example 5:
Please describe any particular problems you had with the tables.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the tables.

Forms.
10) Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, or Example 2.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the forms.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the forms.

11) Frames.
Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, or Example 2.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the frames.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the frames.

12) Headers.
Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, or Example 4.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the headers.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the headers.

13) References.
Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, or Example 3.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the references.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the references.

14) Images.
Figure 1: Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, Example 4, Example 5, or Example 6.

Figure 2: Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, or Example 4.

Figure 3: Which example did you find more accessible?
Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, or Example 4.
Please describe any particular problems you had with the images.
Please describe any features you particularly liked in the images.

Please send your answers to Chetz Colwell <[log in to unmask]>.
Thank you for participating in this study.

Regards,
Chetz

----
Chetz Colwell,
Sensory Disabilities Research Unit,
Department of Psychology,
University of Hertfordshire,
Hatfield,
AL10 9AB,
UK.
Tel: +44 1707 284630,
Fax: +44 1707 285059,
e-mail: [log in to unmask]




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager