JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Archives


ACAD-AE-MED@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED Home

ACAD-AE-MED  March 1999

ACAD-AE-MED March 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Thought I would cheer you up

From:

[log in to unmask] (Rowland Cottingham)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 9 Mar 99 07:37 GMT

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (118 lines)

In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
Thanks for those thoughts, Andrew. You couldn't be further from the mark, 
I'm sorry to say.


> > Just heard this last night - in the new review of Consultant 
> > workload, the
> > UK Government have decided that you are not at work if you are on 
> > call!
> 
> This is all about the European Working Time Directive - not a review of
> Consultant workload.
> For the purposes of this directive all workers (except transport 
> workers,
> armed forces, deep sea fisherman and doctors in training) are limited 
> to a
> maximum of 48 hours a week on average.
> For these purposes work is defined a time spent at the employers 
> disposal AND
> carrying out his duties in accordance with national laws or practice.
> 
> This definition therefore excludes time on call from home not actually
> working.
I have to challenge this. If I am at home, that in itself limits me. I 
cannot go more than 10 miles from my base hospital. I cannot (should I so 
wish) drink beyond the legal limit to drive. So: am I at work or not? I am 
at my employer's disposal, am I not? Furthermore, I am carrying out my 
duties as defined in my job contract*by the virtue of the very fact that I 
am on call*! If someone calls, I give advice or go to the hospital. It is 
analogous to a pilot who is on standby for a flight. He may be at home. He 
may not be flying an aeroplane. But he is available so to do, and this 
counts in his duty hours.

> 
> In negotiations with the NHSE it has been agreed that for all included 
> NHS
> staff time resident on call will count as work for the purposes of the 
> 48 hour
> week.

What bearing does this have on this discussion?

> 
> > So - a junior doctor is at work when on call, and has to have his time
> > fiercely protected etc, etc, but as soon as he becomes a Consultant - 
> > he
> > is not.
> 
> This is not true.
> Doctors in training are excluded from the legal provisions of the EWTD 
> but
> have the contractual protection of the New Deal which limits their 
> hours of
> ACTUAL work to 56 per week.
> The New Deal definition of actual work does not count rest while on 
> call even
> if compulsorily resident.

Again, this is not relevant as we are discussing a different body of 
doctors on different contracts.> 
> When juniors are eventually covered by he EWTD it remains to be seen 
> whether
> rest while resident on call counts as it does for Staff Grades and 
> Consultants
> or whether the New Deal definitions will be used.
> 

> 
> Fill in your diary and use it to demand the appointment of additional 
> A&E
> Consultants.

Try this one. We were shown by the Audit Commission to have too few 
doctors. They identified a review of medical manpower as the top priority 
for A&E to be fixed by March 1999. From winter pressures money a Staff 
Grade appointment was made. He had a wonderful effect on any parameter you 
care to measure. Our waiting times suddenly met the Charter Standards. 
Morale up, etc, etc.The clinical director of Surgery promised that the job 
had to be ratified after March 31st. I heard from a medical personnel 
officer in passing last week that the job would terminate on March 31st. 
No discussion, no request for analysis of benefit.

> If your Chief Executive allows working arrangements which require you 
> to work
> more that 48 hours a week he can be prosecuted by the Health and Safety
> Executive.

Governments can agree anything to make it easy for them. I see this as a 
direct way of undermining Consultants on yet another level.
> 
> He can however continue to abuse his junior staff without fear of 
> prosecution
> as we are excluded from the protection of this legislation.
Ridiculous comment. Any doctor who has not signed the English agreement 
can report the Trust to the Dean and action will be taken with 
consequences at least as bad as action under this head.

I don't want to make this an us v them situation with juniors, Andrew - we 
must all stick together. But you really need to appreciate that many 
seniors (who often baled their Consultants out in their time night after 
night on 1:2s and 1:3s) are starting to feel abused. 


Best wishes,


Rowley Cottingham

[log in to unmask]

"Tradition is slovenliness!" Gustav Mahler on taking up his position as 
Director of the Vienna House when he had been told that a change he wanted 
could not be made as,"We have always done it this way".



%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
September 2022
July 2022
February 2022
January 2022
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
September 2019
March 2019
April 2018
January 2018
November 2017
May 2017
March 2017
November 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
August 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager