Couldn't agree more- plus radicalism of style has nothing to do with
radicalism of content, and often merely substitutes for it.
David.
>Simon Batterbury wrote:
>The quip about 'conventional academic material' is stupid. And not
>definable in any way. How could, say, Gill's piece in Antipode, or the
>poems they used to do in Area, be seen as 'conventional'?
>
>Alastair Bonnett wrote:
>>
>> It is true to say that we don't tend to publish conventional
>> academic material, so, please, no rejected pieces from 'Area',
>> 'Antipode' or whatever ... . The address is given at the bottom of
>> this e-mail. The contents of the last three issues is provided
>> beforehand:
>>
David Wood
PhD Student ('The Rural Peace Dividend')
Department of Agricultural Economics and Food Marketing
University of Newcastle upon Tyne
NE1 7RU
Tel: 0191 222 5305
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|