Renato and I would be very happy to receive comments on our proposal, so
please fire away,
Thanks,
Debbie
Metadata Coordinator
National Initiatives And Collaboration Branch
ph. 02 6262 1673
fx. 02 6273 2545
e-mail [log in to unmask]
http://purl.nla.gov.au/metaweb/home
> ----------
> From: Andrew Wilson[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 January 1999 9:14 AM
> To: 'DC'
> Subject: RE: Bearman paper... Relations
>
> There is in fact a draft set of administrative metadata, known as the
> Admin Core, prepared by Renato Iannella and Debbie Campbell. The
> Internet Draft describing the set can be found at:
> http://metadata.net/admin/draft-iannella-admin-01.txt
>
> Andrew Wilson
> National Archives of Australia
> Email: [log in to unmask]
> Ph: +61 2 6212 3694
> Fax: + 61 2 6212 3997
>
> ________________________
>
> Rachel Heery wrote:
>
> > Maybe I should wait for this discussion to move to the WG, but I think
> > perhaps this is a different issue to 'scheme harmonisation'??
> > I think 'metadata creator' needs to be considered in terms of
> > 'where does
> > administrative metadata go?'. Most implementations store a
> > number of pieces of data referring to 'the metadata' to
> > assist with metadata management.
> >
> > For example
> >
> > Date created
> > Date to be reviewed
> > IPR (of the metadata itself)
> > Organisation that created metadata
> >
> > I would argue that this data is outside the scope of DC :-) It is
> > structured according to a schema in its own 'namespace', its part of a
> > different model. DC does have to have limits doesn't it?
> >
> > Rachel
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|