JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Archives


SOCIAL-POLICY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY Home

SOCIAL-POLICY  January 1999

SOCIAL-POLICY January 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

lone parents

From:

Gillian Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Gillian Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 08 Jan 1999 13:10:15 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (197 lines)

 11 January 1999

MOTHERS ON BENEFIT – A STUDY OF 1,665 LONE MOTHERS IN NORTHERN IRELAND
Evason, E, Robinson, G and Thompson, K. The Stationery Office, Belfast.

The above report is published today. The findings of this report are
significant coming, as they do, at a time of continuing concern over lone
parents’ demand on benefit expenditure, and the introduction of major
policy changes aimed at increasing their participation in the labour
market. The main objectives of the research were (a) to investigate the
factors impacting on labour market decisions - factors acting as either
barriers or as incentives to work and (b) to examine the circumstances of
lone parents on benefits.

The study covered a number of topics included in previous research carried
out in Great Britain. The data from this study is drawn from claimants and
ex-claimants of family credit and income support, whereas studies in Great
Britain have typically been able to include a complete cross-section of
lone mothers (including those not claiming means-tested benefits).
Nevertheless, some broad comparisons can be made. The main findings are as
follows;

Comparisons with GB studies
In comparison to all lone mothers in Great Britain, those selected in
Northern Ireland had much longer durations both as lone parents and as
benefit claimants.

Factors associated with barriers to employment
Lone mothers on benefits in Northern Ireland were more likely than all lone
mothers in Great Britain to be subject to barriers to employment in that
higher proportions;
(i) had children of pre-school age,
(ii) had three or more children,
(iii) possessed no qualifications or qualifications below ‘A’ level
standard (iv) reported that they themselves or one or more of their
children had a
 long-standing illness or disability.
                                                                       

In addition, a lower proportion of lone mothers in the Northern Ireland
study than in the GB studies was receiving regular maintenance. (Lone
mothers in receipt of regular maintenance are much more likely than others
to be employed).

Comparisons between income support and family credit recipients
The same set of factors were found to differentiate between those Northern
Ireland mothers claiming family credit and those claiming income support.
The income support claimants were twice as likely as those receiving family
credit to face two or more obstacles to employment ((i) to (iv) as
outlined above). The perceived quality of employment available was also an
important element in decisions regarding employment.

Income support recipients
The lone mothers receiving income support appeared to be a very stable
group. The vast majority (84%) of those claiming income support at the
time of interview had spent at least two years in total on the benefit.
Only a small minority were making use of, or ever had made use of, the
earnings disregard to enable them to take up part-time work.

The majority wanted to take paid employment of 16 hours or more per week
but only 10% were currently seeking work. A significant minority said that
this was because they would ‘not be better off’ in employment. However,
the most commonly cited reason for delaying entry into employment was the
‘need to look after children’. Although a small number said that this was
because they had no suitable child-care, the majority stated simply that
their children were young, sick or disabled or that they preferred looking
after their children themselves.

When asked what were the most important factors which would help them work,
respondents referred most often to those relating to children’s needs.
However, good wages were also seen as important. Attitudes towards
employment were mixed, with many mothers expressing a desire for the
advantages of work, and negative feelings about being at home, while at the
same time feeling that their children needed the full-time care of their
mothers.
 Family Credit recipients
Among those on family credit, almost a third (30%) had been employed for
over five years with the same employer. In general, however, the research
pointed to a ‘revolving-door’ rather than an ‘escalator’ pattern with
regard to employment and benefit receipt. Only a very small minority of
women had managed to attain total independence from means-tested benefits
through employment; for most the pattern was one of either long-term
receipt of income support, or of rotating between short spells of
employment and periods on income support.

With the exception of the 16-hour rule, the recent changes in family credit
appeared to have had only a limited effect in increasing participation in
the labour market. Even among family credit claimants themselves,
knowledge of some of the key aspects of the benefit was surprisingly
limited, and in general, there was evidence of lower understanding in
Northern Ireland than in GB. As has been found in other research, family
credit appeared to be more critical in assisting lone mothers to remain in
employment once they had found suitable work and arranged for the needs of
their children, than in actually enabling them to make that transition.

As regards the entry into work, although the majority of claimants found
themselves ‘much’ or ‘a bit’ better off than when on income support, many
family credit claimants had not anticipated the reductions in housing
benefit and loss of free school meals incurred on leaving income support.
Nearly one quarter (22%) also said that their family credit entitlement
turned out to be lower than they expected. However, despite this and the
fact that many experienced difficulties in combining work with home and
child-care responsibilities, most women expressed very positive views about
working.

The study also aimed to examine the experience of lone mothers claiming
benefits. In general, there was satisfaction with the administration of
benefits, although in some cases (10% of those receiving income support
and 27% of those receiving family credit) delays in processing claims had
led to difficulties.

Impact of the Child Support Agency
Among the lone mothers interviewed, three quarters (76%) were in contact
with the Child Support Agency (CSA) and the level of compliance with
procedures was high. However, only a minority of women (20%) had reached
the point of being notified of their assessment and only 12% were actually
being paid this amount either directly or through the Department. A
quarter of all assessments were for ‘nil’ amounts, and more than a third
(36%) of those being paid or awaiting payment were for less than £6. In
total, including all CSA assessments, court orders and voluntary
agreements, only a quarter (26%) of mothers were receiving regular
maintenance.

More than half (56%) thought that the amount awarded was less than it
should have been. A minority of women felt that relationships between
their partners and themselves (14%) or their children (9%) had deteriorated
since contact with the CSA. However, there was a noticeable divergence in
overall opinions regarding the CSA with almost two-fifths (39%) stating
dissatisfaction with the agency, but a third (34%) saying that they were
‘quite’ or ‘very’ satisfied.

Health
The data suggest that among lone mothers in Northern Ireland, ill-health,
disability and care-giving are associated with continuing dependence on
income support. Lone mothers on income support were much more likely than
those on family credit to report that their capacity to work was limited by
ill-health or disability in either themselves or their children, and/or
caring responsibilities for others. Self-reported levels of ill-health
and disability appeared generally higher among lone mothers on benefits in
Northern Ireland (28%) and their children (33%) than among all lone parents
(21%) and their children (18%) in Britain.

Levels of self-reported mild psychological distress were much higher than
those found in other studies carried out in Northern Ireland and were
strongly associated with material hardship. Substantial numbers of
respondents reported financial problems, and said that they lacked
essential items for themselves, their children or the home.

Accommodation
Two-thirds (66%) of those interviewed were in Housing Executive
accommodation. There was a high level of satisfaction generally with
housing accommodation.


General Summary
In summary, the factors exerting most influence on entry into the labour
market appeared to be those related to children’s needs and to the
employment opportunities and wage levels available. Benefit system
incentives became important once lone mothers had already secured
employment. Child-care facilities appeared to be less critical to these
mothers than anticipated, suggesting that increased provision in this area,
although valuable to many lone mothers, may not be as significant as has
been envisaged. Of those in employment, only a minority made use of formal
child-care. For many of the others, their roles and responsibilities as
mothers seemed to be of prime importance - they assumed that having young
children was an obvious reason for not working, and expressed preferences
for providing for their children’s needs at this stage.

Although those in employment largely expressed positive views about their
work, some had benefited less in financial terms than they expected. In
addition, almost a quarter (24%) of those in receipt of income support felt
that they were not likely to be better off in employment. Although
satisfaction with the administration of benefits appeared encouragingly
high, the authors of this report recommend a more holistic approach to
administration, with information being provided on all the benefits that
claimants are or could be entitled to, both in and out of work, and on the
interaction between benefits. In this way, claimants could more
accurately assess what they could reasonably expect to gain, in financial
terms, from employment.


For information contact Eileen Evason tel: 01232 793563
email:[log in to unmask]


Gillian Robinson Tel: +44(0) 1504 375502
Research Director Fax: +44(0) 1504 375510
INCORE Email: [log in to unmask]
Aberfoyle House URL: http://www.incore.ulst.ac.uk/
Northland Road
Londonderry
N.Ireland
BT48 7JA


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager