I'm not sure WHY the df differs between the two analyses, but it does: for
the 4-condition version the SPM T is noted as having 71.83 df, the
3-condition version having 72.72 df. (this is assuming that the number
that is reported after "SPM T{" on the results page denotes the df.)
russ
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Russ Poldrack Phone: (650) 725-0797
Dept. of Psychology Fax: (650) 725-5699
Stanford University
Jordan Hall Email: [log in to unmask]
Stanford, CA 94305 Web Page: http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~poldrack/
After August 1, 1999:
MGH-NMR Center
Building 149, 13th St.
Charlestown, MA 02129
Email: [log in to unmask]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|