JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  1999

MINING-HISTORY 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: The test of time

From:

[log in to unmask] (Stafford M Linsley)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 19 Oct 1999 08:37:31 +0100 (BST)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (91 lines)



Subject:  The test of time

Well, yes, but not entirely correct.

The waggonways (tramroads) of north east England had gauges which varied
between 4 feet and 5 feet, but it so happens, that an anonymous
waggonwaywright built the Killingworth waggonway at 4 feet 8 inches gauge,
sometime before 1764, perhaps, or perhaps not, acting on instructions.  It
was on this particular waggonway that George Stephenson was subsequently
involved, and his influence on railway development was so great, that 4 feet
8.5 inches became standard gauge throughout much of the world.  Had he been
involved on the Wylam waggonway (5 feet gauge) instead, the US Standard
railroad gauge might have been a few inches wider; had he been involved on
the Tanfield waggonway (4 feet gauge) it might have been a few inches narrower.

Humbly suggest that you forget about Roman chariots and rutted roads.


>
>More appropriate, good engineering can live long after you.  What good
>engineering works have you done recently?
>
>ENGINEERS TAKE NOTE,THE EVIL YOU DO LIVES AFTER YOU.
>>
>> The US Standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet 8.5
>inches.  That is an exceedingly odd number.  Why was that gauge used? Because
>that is the way they build railroads in England, and the US railroads were 
>built
>by English expatriates.
>
>> Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were
>built by the same people that built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the
>gauge they used.
>> Why did they use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways
>used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons,which used 
>that
>wheel
>> spacing.
>> Okay!  Why did the wagons use that odd wheel spacing?  Well if they tried to
>use any other spacing the wagons would break on some of the old long distance
>roads, because that's the spacing of the old wheel ruts.
>
>> So who built these old rutted roads? The first long distance roads in Europe
>were built by Imperial Rome for the benefit of their legions. The roads have
>been used ever since.
>> And the ruts?  The initial ruts that all had to match for fear of breaking
>their wagons were made by Roman war chariots. Since the charoits were made for
>or by Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.
>
>> So the US railroad gauge of 4 feet 8.5 inches derives from the original
>specification of an Imperial Roman war chariot. Specs and Bureaucracies live
>forever. So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what 
>Horse's
>Ass came up with it, you may be exactly right. The Roman chariots were made to
>be just wide enough to accommadate the backends of two war horses.
>
>> Now the twist to the story.  There is an interesting extension of the story
>about railroad gauge and horses behinds.
>>
>> When you see a space shuttle sitting on the launch pad, there are two big
>booster rockets attached to the main stage shuttle.  These are solid rocket
>boosters(SRB's).  The SRB's are made by Thiokol at a factory in Utah. The
>engineers who designed these SRB's might have preferred to make them fatter, 
>but
>the SRB's had to be shipped by train to the launch site.  The railroad line 
>from
>the factory runs through a tunnel in the mountains. The SRB's had to fit 
>through
>that tunnel.  The tunnel is slightly wider than a railroad track, and the
>railroad track is about as wide as two horses behinds.
>>
>> So the major design feature of what is arguably the worlds most advanced
>transportation system was deternimed by the width of a horse's ass!
>
>
>
Stafford M Linsley
Lecturer in Industrial Archaeology
The University
Newcastle upon Tyne
England
NE1 7RU
Tel. 0191-222 6795




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager