> You can also turn the argument and say, that, after all, 90% of all
> historians still work on pre-1945 science, whereas 90% or more of all
> science in world history has been produced after 1945
I am a bit baffled by one of the premises in Dr. Soderqvist’s note. “90% of
all science” What is this measurable stuff which can even be divided into
percentages? I didn't know a science *stuff* had been discovered.
John van Wyhe
Cambridge
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|