A non-historian colleague sympathetic to history of science has approached me
about a project to do some oral history with senior psychologists. He asks for
literature debating the pros, cons and ethics of such an oral history
methodology, and an example or two of good work.
It is not my field, especially relating to 20th-century psychology, and I'd
welcome some bibliographical advice.
***********
Dr Stephen Pumfrey,
Department of History,
University of Lancaster,
Lancaster LA1 4YG.
[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Tel: +44 1524-592508
Fax: +44 1524-846102
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|