Has anyone had a thought about the relevance of the equations in Prynne's
_Triodes_? Am I right in thinking that III implies 1 + Da + Da = 1 & then
II implies dVG
--- = 1
dVg
And if so, then they "collapse" to a much simpler system. Does this mean
they are "made up" or mistranscribed?
Yours in perplexity,
Alex
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|