JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS Archives

ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS  1999

ARCH-METALS 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

RE: Effect of Titanium in Iron Ore

From:

David J Killick <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 27 Jan 1999 07:41:22 -0700 (MST)

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (50 lines)

The Schlakenatlas/Slag Atlas (Dusseldorf: Verlag Stahleisen M.B.H., 1981)
contains several viscosity plots for titania in blast furnace slags - see
in particular pages 201, 203, 207 and 213. The underlying data are of
varying age and may not be entirely reliable.

If I remember correctly a short tutorial on the subject that Ned Rehder
gave me some years ago, a slag needs to have viscosity under 6 poise to
tap freely. Blast furnace slags are basically CaO + Al2O3 + SiO2, assuming
that enough CaO was added as lime to take up all the gangue (if not, some
of the FeO in the charge will be sacrificed to mop up the excess SiO2 +
Al2O3). The plots in the slag atlas, especially those on p. 207, show that
the viscosity of these slags is marginal (6 or above) at 1400C. The
addition of TiO2 clearly DECREASES the viscosity, as Ian Freestone notes,
and thus makes slags flow more freely - see in particular figure 42 0n p.
207.

If TiO2 doesn't have adverse effects on slag viscosity, then why are
modern blast furnace operators so careful to exclude it from the charge?
The cut-off value for TiO2 in modern blast furnace feed is 1%. (At
Phalaborwa in South Africa, which is a copper mine, the magnetite in the
ore is segregated by Ti content - that under 1% is sold, that above is
dumped in huge heaps. They spray these with molasses to keep the finely
ground ore from blowing, so they act as a Mecca for flies !) The ore above
1% TiO2 can't be sold because in a modern blast furnace the TiO2 would be
reduced into the iron metal, as in the case cited by Peter Hutchinson -
not because of any effect on the viscosity of the slag.

In answer to James Brothers then, I think that the TiO2-slag question is a
red herring. If you are looking for technical reasons for failure, try
looking instead at the difficulties of achieving sufficiently high
fluidity in CaO/SiO2/Al2O3 slags (usually with some MgO as well) in cold
blast furnaces. There could be many reasons for failure to attain
sufficent temperature - damp charcoal, for example, poor furnace design
(leading to "bridging" of the mid-shaft by sintered ore) and lack of skill
on the part of the operators, as in charging incorrect proportions or
trying to tap too soon, resulting in the freezing of slag in the taphole.

----------------------
David J Killick
Associate Professor, Department of Anthropology
University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030
Phone (520)621-8685; FAX 621-2088
[log in to unmask]
http://www.mse.arizona.edu/faculty/killick.html




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager