Please take me off this mailing list !
On Tue, 2 Nov 1999, David B. Klein wrote:
> Please ignore the previous message. The comparisons I must use were given
> incorrectly. Here is the correct situation:
>
> I have 6 measurements, and I'm obliged to use the following two a priori
> comparisons:
>
> 3 vs. 4,5,6
>
> 4 vs. 5,6
>
> I need three more orthogonal comparisons to make a set of 5. I've thought
> of two more pairwise ones that work and then I get stuck. Are there tables
> of such things? Is this done by trial and error? HELP!!!
>
>
> David Klein
>
>
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|