Am I missing something - I was promised a copy of the cdrom (latest
version)some weeks ago and have seen nothing
Thanks
David Davies
On Fri, 15 Oct 1999 12:49:02 +0100 (BST) Robin Walker <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Having received the corrected SLC CD-ROM, we find that the fee-split
> information is almost consistently erroneous.
> Roughly half our students have hyphens in these fields, which is
> supposed to mean that they are Not Eligible in Principle for Fee
> Support. This is quite wrong - they are in fact Eligible for Fee
> Support, but have been assessed for a Personal Contribution of 1025
> (either because of the means test, or because they opted not to
> disclose income information for assessment).
> These students should be shown as (0, 1025), not (-,-). Just to
> prevent the error being entirely consistent, there are just one or two
> students who are correctly shown as (0, 1025).
>
> This may not matter much to the SLC, but the distinction between a
> student who is Not Eligible in Principle for Fee Support, and one who
> is Eligible but receiving zero Fee Support is a critical distinction for
> certain HEIs.
>
> --
> Robin Walker, (Junior Bursar), Queens' College, Cambridge, CB3 9ET, GB
> [log in to unmask] http://www.quns.cam.ac.uk/ Tel:+44 1223 335528
> Fax:335566
>
>
----------------------
David Davies
Strategic Information and Planning Unit
Anglia Polytechnic University
[log in to unmask]
01245 493131 x3731
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|