-----Original Message-----
From: Janusz <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 24 February 1999 15:53
Subject: Re: one word reply - block/slot timetabl
>Please reply to [log in to unmask] and not to entire mailbase (unless you
>think omnes et urbi should know your views)
>
>
>These might all be one word replies but receiving them all is still a damn
>nuisance. May I suggest that in future those wishing to garner
information
>in this way (as distinct from holding a genuine mail-base
>exchange/discussion) head their request with their reply address clearly
>stated. Colleagues seem far too keen to simply hit their "reply" buttons
>without ,I suspect, checking whether reply will go back only to original
>sender or to whole mailbase. I've been as polite as possible in writing
>this -but it really is irritating to have so much space clogged up in this
>way - the 'problem' seems to have become particularly bad in recent weeks.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mark Harris <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>Date: 24 February 1999 15:44
>Subject: RE: one word reply - block/slot timetabl
>
>
>University of London (Central Institutes) - no.
>
>
>Mark Harris
>Statistics Unit
>Finance & Accounting Division, University of London
>Senate House
>
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|