Keston wrote:
> This I
> think is similar to what might be going on today: the obscurity and
> rebarbative allusion of much 'Cambridge' poetry -- which is different
from
> the obscurity of eg Language poetry in its emphasis on compulsory
> erudition -- could be the product of leisure
Keston, would you be so kind as to spell out (briefly) how you
see the contemporary 'Rebarbative' poetry produced under
the Cambridge moniker as essentially different from that
emanating from the US bearing the Language logo? (This is
a serious question--I assume they are permitted in this forum.)
Remark: I don't have any a priori quibble with either; I'm trying
to sort out my own ambivalent, but sometimes very positive,
reactions to examples of both.
Thanks,
Harold
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|