On Thu, 6 May 1999, Peter Riley wrote:
> Whatever we think of Keston's options, and I myself can make no sense of
> his disallowance of Lee Harwood or Robert Anderson, do we not agree with
> him that the whole thing is a great deal more than questions of taste and
> pleasure?
- I'd've thought that was obvious. It's one of the points which stood out
clearly from my cut-down version of his 4 points, and no-one's
contradicted that reading of it. I wouldn't expect them to. As I said, as
such, it approaches truism. Like you, I gathered that Keston felt Harwood
culpable in this respect, but to date he's given us not a scrap of
supporting evidence.
- No, we don't have to take turgid prose from anyone.
RC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|