On Wed, 17 Nov 1999 19:38:29 -0000, elizabeth wrote:
> And by that association, for instance, we
>come back into the semantic ... Is that the hypothesis? that some
>English words not obviously onomatopoeic can also signify *essentially,
>ring true
- "essentially" is right, I guess, and we make our own leaps of
meaning from sound and echoes. Thanks for this,
RC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|