It's hard to take one argument (tracy > morrison) and paste it exactly
over another (teichman > brady); there are bound to be bits that don't
fit. I'm unclear how Teichman's "purple" suggestion relates to Brady's
work, and so am grateful to Nate for offering the hyperbole or
overwriting argument as a valid suggestion. However, it seem to me -
on the strength of fragments quoted and what other people have said -
that the difference lies in the precisions, or intended precisions, of
Brady, which put her in a different valley to Morrison. To read B with
the gush with which one might hack at M seems to me to be a violent
misreading. Of course, it's quite possible to attempt precision and
end up overblown, but I don't think that's what's happening here.
RC
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|