Richard,
Close readings are fine, this is what one finds in Bible reading groups --if
a number on the list have a predilection for a particular poet, it makes
sense that they should collect together in a grouping, like the Prinnies
have done, however it is unfair to impose these enthusiasms upon others who
do not share the same taste. Because in the end it is a matter of taste on
why we decide to read one poet or another. The consensus of most of the
postings seems to be in favour of establing such a circle. If I for example
said that I would like to have close readings of Tom Pickard's
poetry --would there be the same enthusiasm? I doubt it. Unlike you I have
read most of the readings of Prynne's poetry, and yes some have been
insightful, but many have been indulgent. I suggest that either the circle
go sub -- or
they clearly label their offerings with Prynne in parentheses "blah, blah
(Prynne) and this will help also with the archiving so those who wish to
follow the thread and close readings can easily do so.
Regarding the notion of close reading. This again is similar to Bible
exegesis --and though one might find "gems" one also might find a lot of old
potatoes.
I countered this complacency, this "knowingness" based upon half digested
theory, because ultimately I find it suffocating. I think the idea that
there is a "shallow end" and a "deep end" interesting, but condescending,
enforcing the idea that initiates or converts know best.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|