Judy, Yes, the mailbase listing could be used as a means of alerting us all to 'offenders' but as Linda mentions, confidentiality has to be borne in mind so a phone call might be needed if we're actually mentioning names
Christine
IOM
----------
From: lriley[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 23 August 1999 10:45
To: norwhsla group; [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: miscreants
Judy this would be fine with us at Blackburn. However, I feel you'd have to
be pretty careful what you said about someone 'publicly'. I think ringing
each other about specific items is probably better.
Linda
-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 20 August 1999 15:10
Subject: miscreants
I raised the question at a recent norwhsla meeting of any legal
reason why we shouldn't chase missing library book offenders via our
colleagues - always supposing we have been able to track down leavers
going to another hospital. This seemed to be generally accepted,
but what would the feeling be if we pursued people via the norwhsla
mailbase? I personally would be grateful for warnings when readers
with a history of non-returns took up appointments in this hospital!
Views, advice, please. Judy
|