JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS Archives

ARCH-METALS Archives


ARCH-METALS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS Home

ARCH-METALS  1999

ARCH-METALS 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Charcoal - Estimate of usage

From:

"Tim Young" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:38:18 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (79 lines)

Dear Matthew

> Does anyone know (or have a guess at) the approximate ratio of green wood to
> finished charcoal (i.e. in terms of mass - how many kilograms of wood to
> produce one kilogram of charcoal)?  What about how much charcoal was
> required to keep a small smithy in business (i.e. what could be produced
> with a tonne of charcoal - in terms of horseshoes, blades, whatever)?  
> 

We are currently looking at exactly these issues with respect to 
iron-making. To accompany our experimental iron smelting we have 
started a programme of charocoal burning, and over the summer 
we will be experimenting with a series of single-species earth 
clamps - with the product being used for smelting and smithing. I'll 
let you know when we get some real data, but our first clamp had 
approximately 6 cubic metres of stacked oak and generated 
around 180kg of charcoal. I'm not yet certain what the density of 
our stacking is (though others have suggested that solid 
volume/stacked volume of around 0.6, and stacked density of 
0.7t/cubic metre applies to stacked cords). We estimate that 180 
kg should give us two smelts capable of generating 5kg blooms - 
but we are not quite that efficient yet! This figure excludes the 
onward working of the bloom - which would require an additional 
large supply of charcoal, which we haven't measured yet.

If the estimate of stacking density below is true, we got 180 kg 
from around 4 tonnes of wood - a rather poor yield (but it was our 
first attempt)! However, a similarly-sized clamp constructed in 1985 
was estimated to contain only 2.5 tonnes - if this applies to ours 
too, then the yield was more respectable (14:1). We need to check 
the density out this week.

We are told by our charcoal "tutor" to expect a ratio of 8:1 (wood 
wt :charcoal wt) for dry wood and 12:1 for less well seasoned 
material. We have also made some small charcoal samples in the 
lab furnace - but don't have the yield values to hand just now.

The website www.connerprairie.org/cp/fuel.html gives accounts of 
charcoal making in earth clamps gives yields of 35-45 bushels / 
cord. Unfortunately this delightful (and useful) measure wasn't 
ratified as an SI unit!

In the UK the statute cord (but there was much regional variation) 
was 128 stacked cu ft (3.6 cubic metres) and weighed 2.5 tons; 
the long cord was 175 cu ft (3.4 tons). Bill Linnard gave figures of 
coppicing from well-managed woodlands yielding 12 long cords / 
acre. i.e. 1200 solid cubic feet weighing 30 tons green or 20 tons 
seasoned. So you should get 2.5 tons of charcoal/acre. Coppicing 
rotations vary from 16-20 years - giving 0.12-0.16 tons/acre/year 
over the full cycle (0.35 tonnes/hectare per year).

In other words 1 hectare of well-managed woodland would keep our 
bloomery supplied for 4 smelts/year, producing around 20kg 
iron/year, excluding the bloomsmithing operations. (corresponds to 
annual production of 1 tonne from 50 hectares i.e. 1 tonne from 
17.5 tonnes charcoal)

This compares with Hanbury's estimate (1704) for making bar iron 
at Pontypool (by blast furance and forge) of 4-4.5 long cords/ton. 
i.e. 15 tons charcoal per ton of bar iron.

There must be enormous regional variation in all the above figures - 
hence the need for further experiment, but they at least give a clue 
to the magnitudes involved. (DISCLAIMER: at least I hope they do - 
I've done some of the calculations "on the fly" and my head is still 
muzzy from a long day's smelting yesterday!).

Tim


Dr Tim Young
Email: [log in to unmask]
Phone: 01222 747480
Fax: 0870 0547366
Mobile: 0802 413704


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager