Would you also try EZ-Text from CDC. It can be downloaded free of charge from
their website http://www.cdc.gov. Good luck!
Ballard K wrote:
> Thanks Caryl,
> Apparently, Atlasti is not very stable on 3.1 machines. I think this leaves
> me with the choice of Ethnograph and NUD*IST4. Which one to choose?
> I think I will try them both and decide.
> Karen
>
> > ----------
> > From: Caryl Bender[SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: 23 November 1998 16:16
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: software packages for 3.1
> >
> > Hi Karen,
> > As you say, there are a number of software packages for handling
> > data. Your choice will be based on what you are trying to accomplish. If
> > you are building theory, I believe Atlas.ti would be an exceptional tool.
> > I have also used NUD*IST4 - it will do the same things, but has a somewhat
> > easier interface. Both packages say they will run on Windows 3.1.
> >
> > Good luck with your project!
> >
> > Caryl
> >
> >
> > Caryl Bender
> > Technology Research and Evaluation Group
> > Iowa State University
> > Ames, IA 50010
> >
> >
> >
> > There appears to be a number of packages for handling data but I remain
> > >uncertain which is best for me. Could anyone advise.
> > >I have to use windows 3.1 machine. The data I wish to organise consists
> > of
> > >the comments that have been entered onto a longitudinal study
> > questionnaire.
> > >Those that come under 'any other comments that you would like to make'.
> > >There are 5 years worth of data and about 700 sets of comments per year.
> > >Comments range from 2 lines to 20 lines of writing.
> > >I would be grateful for any advise as to how to handle this data.
> > >Karen Ballard
> > >
> > >Karen Ballard
> > >Post Graduate Student
> > >Department of social and political science
> > >Royal Holloway University of London
> > >Egham Hill
> > >Egham
> > >Surrey
> > >e-mail [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|