Prior to DC6 the DC Policy ASdvisory Committee we struck a Process
sub-committee which will report out a formal pocess for moving all
proposals from working group through sanctioned practice. We expect to
hasve such processes adopted by the end of 1998 and will be implementing
them for working group proposals from previous meetings and for the future.
At present no DC document except the rfc has that status.
However, that does not change the fact that 1:1 was agreed at Helsinki in
the plenary. That decision has not in any way been reversed by DC6. The
break-out whioch discussed 1:1 proposed clarifying its application.
David
At 01:50 PM 11/5/98 +1000, Renato Iannella wrote:
>
>On Thu, 5 Nov 1998, Alex Satrapa wrote:
>
>> THE 1:1 ISSUE
>>
>> There's an argument that goes way back (DC-5[1], I believe settled it)
about
>> what actually gets allocated metadata. The term used to describe the
current
>
>The 1:1 issue was raised and discussed at DC5, but never sanctioned
>by the DC community as *the* only way to deploy metadata.
>The issue was again raised at DC6 with similar outcome.
>
>Cheers.... Renato
>
>------------------
>Dr Renato Iannella http://www.dstc.edu.au/renato/
>DSTC Pty Ltd phone://61.7/3365.4310
>Uni Qld, 4072, AUSTRALIA fax://61.7/3365.4311
>- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
>
>
David Bearman
President
Archives & Museum Informatics
2008 Murray Ave, Suite D
Pittsburgh, PA 15217 USA
Phone: +1 412 422 8530
Fax: +1 412 422 8594
[log in to unmask]
http://www.archimuse.com
|