Cliff Morgan wrote:
> IsVersionOf doesn't let us specify a version, does it?
>
> > You're quite right. I should have said HasVersion (as in the User Guide's
> > example Relation="HasVersion 13th Edition, 1972"). Sorry about confusing
> > these two relationship types. However, my point that this information
> > belongs in Relation rather than Title still stands.
I have two observations re the above:
1. I'm primarily interested in qualifed DC. The above example of
unqualifed DC seems to concatenate various pieces of information into
a not very useful string.
2. If I have a resource A and want to specify its version, why should I
have to do so indirectly via the metadata belonging to another
resource, B?
Misha
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender,
except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of
Reuters Ltd.
|