In article <[log in to unmask]>, Victor Calland
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>
>On the basis of these I think seeking advice from a wide range of
>colleagues is justified, perhaps it is the answers that need to be
>moderated in consideration of the immensely unlikely possibility that an
>interested & malicious party might be looking in. Please ladies and
>gentlemen, jokes and wry comments please, it makes reading worthwhile, but
>lets not denigrate our colleagues.... One day they might be fighting to
>save our lives.
I agree - let's discuss - I disagree that we have to be so obvious about
identities, locations etc - is this small bit of care really to much to
ask - certainly there are others who may demand it.
As to the running down of colleagues - well I dont feel that I have done
that - and Rowley hasnt too much either ;-)
Hey - do you all want a larf?
Here's me going on about confidentiality and all that - I just
accidentally published my secret username and password to a secure web-
site on a public list with over 600 members!!
Ooops!
Cheers all :)
--
Dr Jel Coward
'There's no such thing as bad weather - just bad clothing"
Anon Norwegian
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|