JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY Archives


HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY Archives

HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY Archives


HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY Home

HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY Home

HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY  September 1998

HISTORY-CHILD-FAMILY September 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

"Hopeful Daughters"

From:

[log in to unmask] (Lloyd deMause)

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Fri, 11 Sep 1998 10:26:04 -0400 (EDT)

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (115 lines)

List members will be interested in reading the chapter "Childhood and
Cultural Evolution" from my book "Childhood and History" which is posted on
our website <www.psychohistory.com>   A selection from it  introducing the
concept of "hopeful daughters" follows.
Lloyd deMause

"The task of fathering-of playing a real role in forming a child's
psyche-is in fact a very late historical invention. Most fathers among our
closest ape relatives don't have much to do with their children,  and a
nurturing role during early childhood for the human father turns out to be
a far more recent historical innovation than has heretofore been assumed.
The major epigenetic changes in the structures of the brain, therefore,
have mainly been evolved by females, not males. Fathers until recently have
affected their children's psyches mainly through family provisioning and by
establishing some of the conditions for mothering, but it has mainly been
the mothers who have produced epigenetic novelty; so to discover the laws
of cultural evolution one must "follow the mothers" through history. This
is why only the psychogenic theory posits that for most of history women
and children are the ultimate source of historical change.

THE "HOPEFUL DAUGHTER" AND THE PSYCHOGENIC CUL-DE-SAC
        Since for most of history mothers raise boys who then go off and
hunt, farm, build things and fight wars rather than directly contributing
much new to the psyche of the next generation, the course of evolution of
the psyche has overwhelmingly been dependent upon the way mothers have
treated their daughters, who become the next generation of mothers. Since
early emotional relationships organize the entire range of human behavior,
all cultural traits do not equally affect the evolution of the psyche-those
that affect the daughter's psyche represent the main narrow bottleneck
through which all other cultural traits must pass. The study of the
evolution of the psyche depends more on developing a maternal ecology than
on studying variations in the physical environment.
        The evolution of the psyche and culture has been crucially
dependent upon turning the weak bonds between mother and daughter of apes
and early humans  into genuine love for daughters (and sons).  This means
that historical societies that create optimal conditions for improving the
crucial mother-daughter relationship by surrounding the mother with support
and love soon begin to show psychological innovation and cultural advances
in the next generations-so that history begins to move in progressive new
directions. In contrast, societies that cripple the mother-daughter
emotional relationship experience psychogenic arrest and even psychogenic
devolution. Only in modern times have fathers, too, begun to contribute to
the evolutionary task of growing the young child's mind.
        Paralleling the term "hopeful monster" that biologists use to
indicate speciating biological variations,  the idea that the
mother-daughter emotional relationship is the focal point of epigentic
evolution and the main source of novelty in the psyche can be called the
"hopeful daughter" concept. When mothers love and support particularly
their daughters, a series of generations can develop new childrearing
practices that grow completely new neuronal networks, hormonal systems and
behavioral traits. If hopeful daughters are instead emotionally crippled by
a society, a psychogenic cul-de-sac is created, generations of mothers
cannot innovate, epigenetic arrest is experienced and meaningful cultural
evolution ends.
        For instance, in China before the tenth century A.D. men began to
footbind little girls'feet as a sexual perversion, making them into sexual
fetishes, penis-substitutes which the men would suck on and masturbate
against during sex play.  Chinese literature reports the screaming cries of
the five-year-old girl as she hobbles about the house for years to do her
tasks while her feet are bound, because in order to make her foot tiny, her
foot bones are broken and the flesh deteriorates. She loses several toes as
they are bent under her foot, to emphasize the big toe as a female penis.
This practice was added to the many brutal practices of what was perhaps
the world's most anti-daughter culture, where over half the little girls
were murdered at birth without remorse and special girl-drowning pools were
legion, where beating little girls until bloody was a common parental
practice, and where girl rape and sex slavery were rampant.  This vicious
anti-daughter  emotional atmosphere-extreme even for a time that was
generally cruel and unfeeling towards daughters-was obviously not conducive
to mothers producing innovations in childrearing when the little girls grew
up. Therefore China-which was culturally ahead of the West in many ways at
the time of the introduction of footbinding-became culturally and
politically "frozen" until the twentieth century, when footbinding was
stopped and boy-girl sex ratios in many areas dropped from 200/100 to near
equality.  The result was that whereas for much of its history China
punished all novelty,   during the twentieth century rapid cultural,
political and economic evolution could resume. Japan, which shared much of
Chinese culture but did not adopt footbinding of daughters, avoided the
psychogenic arrest of China and could therefore share in the scientific and
industrial revolution as it occurred in the West.
        The same kind of epigenetic arrest can be seen in the damage caused
by genital mutilation of girls among circum-Mediterranean peoples that
began thousands of years ago and continues today. Since "hopeful daughters"
do not thrive on the chopping off of their clitorises and labias, the
present cultural and political problems of those groups who still mutilate
their daughters' genitals are very much a direct result of this psychogenic
arrest.  Much of the remainder of this chapter will analyze the conditions
for psychogenic arrest, when childrearing has failed to evolve and culture
remains in a psychogenic cul-de-sac, static for millennia.
        The historical evolution of the psyche is a process that mainly
involves removing developmental distortions, so that each psyche can
develop in its own way optimally. The evolution of childhood, as will be
extensively documented, mainly consists of parents slowly giving up
killing, abandoning, mutilating, battering, terrorizing, sexually abusing
and using their children for their own emotional needs and instead creating
loving conditions for growth of the self. The evolution of the psyche is
first of all accomplished by removing terrible abuses of children and their
resulting developmental distortions, allowing the psyche to produce
historical novelty and achieve its own inherent human growth path.
Civilization is not, as everyone including Freud has assumed, a historical
"taming of the instincts." Nor does "the evolution of mankind proceed from
bad to worse," as Roheim thought,  with early societies being "indulgent"
toward their children and modern societies more often abusive. It will be
the burden of the remainder of this book to provide evidence that just the
reverse is true, that culture evolves through the increase of love and
freedom for children, so that when they grow up they can invent more
adaptive and happier ways of living. Because we were all children before we
were adults, childhood evolution must precede social evolution,
psychogenesis must precede sociogenesis."




%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
January 2024
December 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
August 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
September 2021
June 2021
April 2021
March 2021
January 2021
November 2020
October 2020
June 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
October 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
July 2018
October 2017
July 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
October 2016
August 2016
July 2016
May 2016
February 2016
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
March 2015
January 2015
December 2014
October 2014
May 2014
April 2014
February 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
November 2012
September 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
March 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
June 2010
April 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
July 2009
April 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
August 2007
April 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
May 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
September 2005
August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
March 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
May 2002
February 2002
January 2002
November 2001
October 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager