Yes, that's what I thought too.
p
At 08:13 AM 1/28/98 -0500, you wrote:
>List Readers:
>
>I wonder if we are of one mind regarding DC-Simple, which I understand
>to mean the set of fifteen Dublin Core elements and their definitions.
>
>All other additions would belong to some version of DC-"whatever," but
>*not* DC-Simple.
>
>The DC-5 report should define DC-Simple as well as the state of
>DC-"whatever" v. 0.1, including decisions, open issues, and
>expectations.
>
>For your consideration and response,
>
>--Erik
>
>Erik Jul
>[log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>
|