JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY Archives

PODIATRY Archives


PODIATRY@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY Home

PODIATRY  1998

PODIATRY 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Science and research

From:

Jeff Root <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sat, 28 Mar 1998 09:07:38 -0800

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (64 lines)

Graham Curryer wrote:
> 
> Ray,
> 
> >I'd like to throw this open to all...let's really discuss how the
> profession can take clinical podiatric biomechanics into the scientific
> domain. Try to avoid the totally philosophical approach and get down to
> what specific bits of research we really should concentrate on....so
> where
> do we begin and how do we proceed?<
> 
> Thanks Ray.
> 
> If anyone has any comments good or bad! on my suggested reasearch
> critical pathway nows the time to get stck in, or if there are other
> suggestions to consider throw them into the sack and lets see what
> comes out! My suggested outline is copied below .
> 
> Step One
> 1) We can take the kinematic parameters suggested and test a cohort of
> "normal" subjects, each as there own control and demonstrate which
> parameters are a) testable - b) reliable - c)repeatable & d)valid. (within
> the limitations of our available technology.

Jeff replies:
Graham, doesn't the technology need to be developed and designed to test
specific parameters first?  Are you attempting to evaluate parameters
with an as yet, unproven technology.  Or are you attempting to develop
the technology so that certain parameters can be tested?  Or does the
technology currently exist?

I realize that for true progress to occur, there needs to be advancement
in both the technologies and the methodologies employed.

My personal sense of things from your comments above is that you may be
attempting to test too many variables at once.  Why not focus on one or
two primary elements of function and then refine you technique so that
you develop credibility with your system and methods.  Then, attempt to
build on the solid foundation once you have established it. 

I would also not feel compelled to attempt to draw any far reaching
conclusions from your data.  Collect you data and attempt to assess it
given the confines of your system.  The data may have value even if it
can not be fully explained.  If you attempt to draw conclusions because
you feel it is expected of you, my may make invalid assumptions that
could compromise your credibility.

If myself or others on the mailbase knew more about your current
methods, we might be able to make more specific recommendations for
research.  What equipment do you use for research or clinical purposes? 
For example, do you have the ability to evaluate forces on the plantar
surface of the foot and the plantar surface of the shoe simultaneously? 
Don't you think this would provide useful information about foot
function with and without the use of orthoses?

I would like to hear more about your work.

Regards,

Jeff


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2023
March 2023
April 2021
February 2020
January 2019
June 2018
May 2018
February 2018
August 2017
March 2017
November 2016
April 2016
January 2016
March 2015
November 2014
April 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
October 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
November 2011
October 2011
August 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager