JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MED-AND-REN-MUSIC Archives


MED-AND-REN-MUSIC Archives

MED-AND-REN-MUSIC Archives


MED-AND-REN-MUSIC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MED-AND-REN-MUSIC Home

MED-AND-REN-MUSIC Home

MED-AND-REN-MUSIC  1998

MED-AND-REN-MUSIC 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Peres the mad genius & Ensemble Organum

From:

"R.A.Howe" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

R.A.Howe

Date:

Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:00:49 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (55 lines)

Matthew Westphal wrote:

> This makes me want to put the following questions out:
> 
> "Genius": Which Ensemble Organum recordings do you think are the most
> important?   Ground-breaking, influential, etc. -- you pick (and state) the
> criteria for importance.
> 
> Which Ensemble Organum recordings do you find the most beautiful or
> pleasing?
> 
> "Mad": Which Ensemble Organum recordings do you think were  the biggest
> misses and why?
> 
> Matthew Westphal
> [log in to unmask]

Perhaps we should make mention of the liturgical nature of the music.
The chant (with other early liturgial music) and liturgical text are
theoretically inseperable. The above questions may be tantamount to
asking which prayers we find the 'most beautiful or pleasing' or
misguided, etc. While we can make judgements like this, this is simply
not what a prayer is about.
	If we assume that Peres has a thorough grounding in Roman Catholic
liturgy (as seems likely considering his position) then we must ask what
of his recordings fulfil their liturgical role the best.
	If we take the view that the sacrament of Mass is 'where heaven and
earth meet' (what a sweeping generalisation; bear with me as this isn't
really the place for expounding Christian liturgical metaphysics), then
perhaps we should expect the music to be as 'different' and special as
possible. When the modern plainsong revival started during the last
century, it was only ever heard in church. It was 'special' and
unworldly. Now plainsong is commmonly heard on the radio, and even is
'troped' with drum-tracks for popular consumption. Perhaps Peres's
making of liturgical music as strange as possible is an attempt to
return to the 'other-wordliness' that church music 'used to have'. An
attempt to prevent it from being 'ambient music'; to turn it back into
prayer. To make it appear 'unsullied' by the world if you like.
	I've made many sweeping generalisations, grounded more in the broad
opinion of many churchgoers (which is more important in this issue) than
in musicological and historical fact, but my point is clear. Is Peres
responding to artistic and commercial pressures, or more to liturgical
neccessity and religious belief? Obviously to both, but which is more
important?

	So I posit an additional question:

Which Ensemble Organum recordings/interpretations would you find most
affective/effective for real liturgy?

		Rob Howe.


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
September 2023
June 2023
May 2023
August 2022
July 2022
April 2022
January 2022
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
July 2020
May 2020
March 2020
January 2020
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
June 2019
April 2019
February 2019
December 2018
November 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
April 2018
November 2017
September 2017
April 2017
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
June 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
September 2013
August 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
May 2008
April 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager