In article <002001be1fe5$7aeee140$cfc1edc1@pwilson>, Peter Wilson
<[log in to unmask]> writes
Discussion of identifiable patients without their consent remains a
breach of confidentiality
Mary
>We have four expressions of interest to date.
>
>Ahmad's idea would certainly suit my needs.
>
>Would it be secure _enough_ to enable detailed discussion?
>
>Any more to make his effort worthwhile?
>
>Replies to me or the list will be collated for further action
>
>Peter
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Ahmad Risk <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Sent: Friday, December 04, 1998 10:05 PM
>Subject: Re: Help gp-uk
>
>
>>>"Peter Wilson" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>>Just recently I've noticed several members
>>>> requesting advice or opinions on specific problems yet there is always a
>>>> danger of breaching confidentiality even if the names and other
>non-critical
>>>> details are changed.
>>
>>How about a secure mailing list for these discussions to take place?
>>
>>I can set that up but members will have to verify to me beforehand that
>>they are in fact doctors.
>>
>>Ahmad
>>
>>---------------------------------
>>Dr Ahmad Risk
>>Editor Health Informatics Europe
>>http://hi-europe.co.uk
>>Tel: +44 1273 321805
>>Fax: +44 1273 774614
>>
>>
>
Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|