JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GP-UK Archives


GP-UK Archives

GP-UK Archives


GP-UK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GP-UK Home

GP-UK Home

GP-UK  1998

GP-UK 1998

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Nursing homes

From:

"Andrew Herd" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 11 Feb 1998 08:22:53 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (89 lines)

We have had this experience in Durham, and a tough one it is to resolve too.

Technically, the home are right, you aren't entitled to payments for GMS
services - defining "more than GMS" is the tricky bit.

Your only options are (1) to send a rocket to the management (unlikely to
work), (2) to institute call vetting and pursue a tough line on visits, or
(3) to deregister the patients.

The approach I have seen working is to combine the three. Write to say that
you cannot manage the workload, deregister about 25% of the patients, and
warn them that the remainder are on notice, and that you will be vetting
calls. Talk to the CHC before you do this!

This approach has worked for at least one practice in the North-East, but it
might be difficult to push it through without your partners' support.

I would warn everyone on the list that Patrick is not alone in having been
subjected to this sort of thing, and nursing homes frequently use payments
as an inducement, then withdraw them, usually when the home occupancy falls,
or there is a change in ownership/management. The practice concerned then
finds itself in the poo, having built up a high level of expectation of
service which is difficult to wind down. I do not advise practices to accept
payments (which are capable of being misinterpreted, and can add a spicy
twist to complaints) and where possible, make sure that you are not the only
practice with which the home registers patients. There is safety in numbers!

Andrew

Dr. Andrew N. Herd MRCGP                               [log in to unmask]
  Family Physician, Medical Adviser to Durham Health Authority
  Lecturer in Primary Care, Durham University
  Medical Editor, Practice Computing
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Pearson <[log in to unmask]>
To: 'gp-uk' <[log in to unmask]>
Date: 10 February 1998 22:43
Subject: FW: Nursing homes




-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Pearson [SMTP:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 10 February 1998 22:30
To: 'gp-uk'
Subject: Nursing homes


About 8 years ago a new nursing home opened in our practice area and the
owner?matron begged us to take on her patients because the poor sucker that
was already doing the job refused to come out at night from miles away and
visit anyone who was " a bit chesty and we would like him/her checked out".
Against my better judgement my senior partner agreed to take them on when
she offered a "retainer" fee  of £x per patient per quarter. Being the
junior partner it was democratically decided by everyone else that I should
take on the work.

They get a regular weekly visit, computerised repeat prescriptions with a
one day delivery service, visits on demand, regular reviews of patients and
nursing problems, advice on nutrition and hygiene, a 24 hour a day service,
annual flu and pneumovax service, visiting phlebotomy by our practice nurses
as well as ear syringing as the matron refuses to allow any of her staff to
do this job,

She had a row with the SP after he complained about yet another request for
an out of hours visit and she unilaterally refused to pay our retainer fee.

Since then she has steadfastly refused to pay up despite frequent requests
saying that we are not providing anything in excess of normal GMS services.

We have one of the highest ratios of nursing home beds in the area and
frankly I am pissed off with going there.

I realise that we cannot demand a "retainer fee" but I feel that the service
provided far exceeds  what is understood by GMS . The bulk of the patients
are very old, frail, demented and decamped from local long stay psychiatric
hospitals which are now closing down.

What are other subscribers experiences of such situations??

Patrick





%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
October 2023
August 2023
June 2023
May 2023
February 2023
June 2022
October 2021
January 2021
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
March 2020
January 2020
December 2019
September 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
March 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager