In message <[log in to unmask]>,
[log in to unmask] writes
>Rotherham HAs have unilaterally (ie no consultation) withdrawn 100%
>reimbursement for registration and IOS links, claiming that the SFA's
>have been changed and the district auditor has instructed them to
>change policy.
Does this mean that there is no more *central* funding for Links?
>They also claim that other HAs in Trent and
>surrondings do not reimburse at 100%.
Can this be checked?
>
>1. Have the SFAs changed?
did it ever come in SFAs? - always thought it was separate funding and
*that* allowed 100% reimbursement!
>2. Who is no longer getting 100% reimbursement?
>3. Suggestions for action?
Don't Link
>4. Is it reasonable action for the HA to take even if the SFAs do not
>limit their actions?
vs about SFAs. No,it isn't reasonable - the main objective in Links was
to save administrative costs for the HA - to expect this to be funded
from either the practice or GMS is *not* reasonable.. and not affordable
after the staging of the last Review Body award..
Mary
>
>
>Dr David J Plews
>------------------------
Mary Hawking Kingsbury Court Surgery Church Street Dunstable LU5 4RS
tel:01582 663218 (surgery)fax:01582 476488 (surgery)
Member of British Healthcare Internet Association
Dunstable and Houghton Regis Locality Commisssioning Pilot
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|